Category
📺
TVTranscript
00:30What are you looking for, darling?
01:01Don't be afraid.
01:1430 seconds now.
01:17Good.
01:26You have time.
01:30This side.
02:00Juraj Gedra. Please, Mr. Deputy Chairman.
02:30The Security Council has informed us
02:33about the overall security situation
02:36with an emphasis on spreading hateful statements
02:39by the society.
02:41And this, above all, from the side of the security services
02:44such as the law enforcement services,
02:46the police and the prosecutor's office.
02:49I would like to provide you with some basic numbers
02:52and figures about the reports you have heard.
02:55In the last year,
02:57a year after the assassination of Robert Fitch,
03:00the number of hateful statements
03:03expressed in percentages increased by 239%.
03:08Yes, it is a sad fact.
03:10Instead of the society calming down,
03:13instead of getting into a regime
03:16that will be calmer and more peaceful,
03:19the security services have recorded
03:21such an enormous increase in hateful statements
03:24by the society with an emphasis,
03:27above all, on the person of Robert Fitch,
03:30a representative of the majority of the political party SMER,
03:34but there are also hateful statements
03:37against some representatives of the opposition.
03:40The second fact I would like to draw your attention to,
03:43because it reflects the overall situation,
03:46is the number of times
03:49a journalist, specifically a journalist N,
03:52reports about the assassination of Robert Fitch.
03:55We have reached a number
03:58where every day of the year
04:01this journalist, this web portal,
04:04has at least three statements
04:07that are, in the eyes of Robert Fitch,
04:10of course, more hateful than critical,
04:13acceptable from a journalistic point of view.
04:16These are caricatures, these are articles,
04:19these are comments that we all know,
04:22but I would like to draw your attention to this number.
04:25365 days a year, every day,
04:28three such comments,
04:31aimed only at the person of Robert Fitch.
04:34This is an attack on this person,
04:37this is not a journalistic criticism,
04:40and I say this because
04:43yesterday I opened this issue of spreading hate,
04:46and I started, of course,
04:49primarily with the opposition politicians,
04:52but I also mentioned the media.
04:55A specific case that we presented here yesterday was discussed.
04:58It was a case from May 8,
05:01from a public meeting,
05:04where one of the supporters of the current opposition politics,
05:07I dare say, from the latest information from yesterday,
05:10and probably also a member of the Democratic Party,
05:13spoke without any problem
05:16in a public space on video,
05:19holding an axe in his hand,
05:22that it is the end of Robert Fitch,
05:25that his end is approaching,
05:28that in a moment the last wedge in his coffin will be pierced,
05:31and that someone will put him down.
05:34On this occasion, we would like to share with you
05:37some information from the video,
05:40so that I can comment on them later,
05:43so now I would like you to play the first video.
05:46...
05:49...
05:52...
05:55...
05:58...
06:01...
06:04Now I would like to ask for a photo.
06:11And I would like to point out to you
06:15that there is a mark on the clothes of the person
06:18who was threatening Robert Fitch on video,
06:21which we released yesterday and which we released again today.
06:24And now allow me to comment on why I am saying this,
06:27because at the meeting
06:30and at the public meeting on May 8,
06:33the opposition political parties met,
06:36Mr. Nadej from the Democratic Party,
06:39where everyone raised their hands
06:42and asked how they would cooperate
06:45in bringing back progressive Slovakia,
06:48the Christian-democratic movement,
06:51and the Freedom and Solidarity parties.
06:54That is why we released this photo,
06:57because on this photo there is a chairman of the Democratic Party,
07:00with a person who spreads hateful statements,
07:03who spreads them by holding a cold weapon in his hand,
07:06an axe,
07:09where he could easily cause a conflict,
07:12and in this setting, in the way this person is,
07:15it is possible to assume that he could cause another conflict,
07:18without me exaggerating anything.
07:21In the previous video,
07:24you saw that this person is handy
07:27in using cold weapons,
07:30and there is information that he was preparing
07:33to protest today in Handlova
07:36in front of the local government,
07:39which is being organized there after lunch,
07:42or at the meeting organized by the political party SMER.
07:45But I will return to the mark I was talking about,
07:48which I wanted you to pay attention to.
07:51It is a mark that can be called
07:54an extremist symbol, a fascist symbol
07:57of an offensive unit called Edelweiss,
08:00which you all know as an anti-partisan unit
08:03who liberated Slovakia,
08:06or who rose up in the Slovak National Uprising,
08:09fought against the civilians,
08:12exterminated the Slovak people.
08:15Next to the person who spreads these fascist, extremist symbols
08:18is the chairman of the political party Demokratia.
08:21Do you think he could not have noticed this mark?
08:24That is my first question, very important.
08:27My second problem is
08:30how does he proceed in this particular case
08:33from the side of the organs of the actual crimes.
08:36I think that a much smaller number of people
08:39who spread these extremist symbols,
08:42or even fascist symbols,
08:45can and know how to solve organized crime
08:48much faster, more rapidly and without problems.
08:51What information do we have about this particular case
08:54and the words that this person said
08:58so the prosecutor's office decided
09:01that the person will not be detained,
09:04that no further actions will be taken with this person
09:07because his words can be considered a crime.
09:10I wonder if there was no reason
09:13to go to this person's house,
09:16if he does not have plans at home
09:19on how to put Roberta Fica down,
09:22if he does not have any other fascist symbols at home
09:25so that the public can see
09:28that such a thing is not tolerated.
09:31I asked the Security Council
09:34to inform the public
09:37about specific cases, about specific threats,
09:40about specific statements that are on social networks,
09:43about specific perpetrators,
09:46so that you can hear the numbers of these statements
09:49and understand the state of Slovakia,
09:52and this is something
09:55that I once again point out
09:58to all, especially to the opposition political parties.
10:01I call on Mr. Šimeček, who gave a statement yesterday
10:04where he said that Robert Fica
10:07can do it himself and that he is the one who spreads hatred,
10:10to look at who they are helping
10:13and who they are planning their political future with.
10:16I also said this to the representative of the Christian Democratic Movement
10:20and it is time, ladies and gentlemen,
10:23to distance yourselves from this,
10:26to finally express to the public
10:29what opinions Matovič spreads,
10:32which Mr. Naď spreads,
10:35because on this podium you heard the same words
10:38that we presented here and which called for
10:41the suspension of Robert Fica
10:44and in a different way than it has done so far.
10:47Mr. Fica, if you have a bit of conscience,
10:50I call on you to finally stand up to this publicly,
10:53as you should, as a man,
10:56and finally say what is good, what is bad
10:59and what you really want to limit yourself to.
11:02This is what is most necessary for this situation,
11:05so that people understand that you also distinguish
11:08between good and bad.
11:11That's all from me, I'll give the floor to my colleagues.
11:18Allow me to say a few words today,
11:21because this day is more emotional for me,
11:24because I was a few meters away from Robert Fica
11:27during the time of the assassination
11:30and I will always have this image in front of my eyes
11:33and this experience for the rest of my life.
11:36We are a year from the assassination
11:39and I feel that we are dealing with a much worse situation than a year ago.
11:42This man, with his rhetoric,
11:45with his speech,
11:48with his pride in his words,
11:51is a symbol of what is spreading today
11:54in the cities,
11:57what is in the heads, unfortunately,
12:00I dare say in the heads of some opposition leaders,
12:03who support it, who create a background
12:06and a communication platform,
12:09but what bothers me the most
12:12and what I am afraid of is that
12:15despite the fact that this video is nothing new,
12:18because it has been spreading on Facebook for a few days,
12:21I have not seen a single piece of information
12:24in the mainstream media,
12:27a single rejection, a single deterioration,
12:30a single challenge in relation to progressive Slovakia,
12:33in relation to freedom and solidarity,
12:36in relation to democracy,
12:39quite the opposite.
12:42Selected media such as DNI and others,
12:45Actuality, are doing everything today
12:48to make progressive Slovakia and democracy
12:51join forces to save some political capital
12:54and to do everything to defeat the party SMER in the next parliamentary elections.
12:57If the political competition is fair,
13:00we have no problem with it.
13:03If someone has gone mad
13:06because of his hatred for Robert Fitch
13:09and is able to not only live on,
13:12but also support the things this man is producing.
13:15Deník En has not noticed
13:18what is happening in the streets.
13:21He is blindly cursing and slandering people
13:24against Robert Fitch.
13:27Yesterday's article on Actuality.sk
13:30was published.
13:33What kind of hatred does Robert Fitch have?
13:36Robert Fitch is a man of hatred?
13:39Who shot him?
13:42What were his motives?
13:45Who gave him those motives?
13:48What are you doing in these media?
13:51We are a year from the assassination
13:54and we are dealing with a man who is capable of
13:57filling his imagination.
14:00He is so proud that he puts it on Facebook
14:03under his own name and says
14:06that the last moment of Robert Fitch is coming.
14:09And you are all quiet and calm
14:12and I am not even talking about OCTK.
14:15I will tell you frankly,
14:18I have great respect for today's trade events.
14:21Because when someone decides to do something,
14:24there is no other way to do it.
14:27This is an appeal to the political parties in the opposition.
14:30Oppose us.
14:33Compete with us.
14:36But in a scientific, argumentative, critical way.
14:39We are trained.
14:42You have to see what absurdities
14:45opposition representatives and media are capable of
14:48to harm us somehow.
14:51But people who are on the streets
14:54do not have the ability to evaluate
14:57what is OK and what is not OK.
15:00And if they are able to formulate such things
15:03and sign on them, then I am afraid
15:06that we are dealing with another big problem
15:09that you media cannot get rid of
15:12because you did not share it.
15:15So we are calling for a progressive Slovakia
15:18that did not stand in the way of this challenge
15:21of the political party Demokrata,
15:24which this gentleman is a member of, according to our information.
15:27This gentleman prepared himself for trade today
15:30and probably will not support Robert Fica.
15:33We are calling for Mr. Šimeček
15:36and the communication tool DNI-GEN
15:39to not participate in legitimizing such attitudes
15:42under any circumstances in connection with the political party Demokrata.
15:45We are well aware of the statement of Mr. Nadja
15:48from the parliament a few days ago.
15:51We are in such a frenzy that Robert Fica is not coming back.
15:54These are all public statements and are only hidden behind metaphors,
15:57but we know very well what is going on in their heads
16:00because the people at the parliaments have figured it out.
16:03Let's go back to the political competition
16:06that will be based on scientific criticism and solutions.
16:09We are doing everything to make Slovakia a better place.
16:13We are going in full circles that you, the media,
16:16do not want to notice because it is not good for you,
16:19because it is being done by the political party SMER.
16:22Let's go back to politics and let's end with hatred.
16:25Thank you very much.
16:28Ladies and gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen,
16:31I will be very brief.
16:34Today, because of the fact that DNI-GEN
16:37and their political party Progressive Slovakia
16:40with its chairman, Mr. Šimeček,
16:43hate Robert Fica and hate this government.
16:46The second fact is that they hate Igor Matovič
16:49and his movement,
16:52Šimeček and DNI-GEN.
16:55Because according to them, Igor Matovič is not fair
16:58and in short, they hate him
17:01because their elitist approach
17:04has the feeling that they are better than anyone else.
17:10Therefore, I ask the public,
17:13when Igor Matovič hates them,
17:16why does Mr. Naď, Mr. Galko
17:19and other members of the Democratic Party
17:22hate them?
17:25Because it was not Igor Matovič,
17:28it was Jaroslav Naď who,
17:31because of his side, Šimeček,
17:34was speaking at the same protest,
17:37which ended with Robert Fica.
17:40It is Mr. Galko who, in the Parliament,
17:43challenges his supporters
17:46to physical attacks on representatives
17:49of the ruling coalition.
17:52And it is Mr. Naď, who stands on the side of a man
17:55that you could have seen on the video,
17:58who presents himself in a Ukrainian flag
18:01with an axe in his hand
18:04to stab Robert Fica in the neck.
18:07Why, Mr. Šimeček,
18:10do you not distance yourself from people
18:13such as the Democratic Party,
18:16which, in my opinion, produced Cintula?
18:19There are photos and evidence
18:22of significant cooperation
18:25between the Democrats or the Cintulists
18:28with Mr. Cintula.
18:31Today, I have the feeling that Mr. Cintula II
18:34is producing here, who is younger,
18:37who, unlike Mr. Cintula, knows how to use a weapon,
18:40and he might have hit me in the head,
18:43just like a lot of people in the Cintula coalition do.
18:46So, when Mr. Šimeček smells like Matovič,
18:49who is not even close to Naď in his aggressiveness,
18:52he is not even close to people like this man,
18:55who has a photo with Naď,
18:58a bit different, but equally decent.
19:01Mr. Korčok, these are your colleagues,
19:04this is your decency, which you have been talking about
19:07from morning till night.
19:10This is your decency.
19:13I call on the representatives of the Progressive Slovakia,
19:16because the President of the SÁS
19:19publicly allows the convergence
19:22of the Progressive Slovakia and the Democratic Party.
19:25the progressive party of Slovakia and the democracy
19:28to let it go, because if they do so,
19:31any doubt about
19:34and all the talk about
19:37obedience and that someone is aggressive or not
19:40ends. If Michal Šimečka
19:43connects with Jaroslav Nadej legitimizes
19:46such a style of politics, which is
19:49directly responsible for the attack
19:52on the chairman of the government. Thank you.
19:55A small addition to the group
19:58Edel Weiss, and it is quite funny,
20:01because Edel Weiss captured
20:04the Slovakian civilians, captured
20:07the supporters of the Slovak National Uprising,
20:10burned the villages on the territory of Slovakia
20:13and it is so significant that people on the right
20:16side of that obedient democratic
20:19have doubts about the Slovak National Uprising.
20:22In fact, the father of Mr. Šimečka doubts
20:25the Slovak National Uprising, he calls it
20:28Bansko-Bistricka, and that the national meaning
20:31was given to him by communist propaganda.
20:34It was Mrs. Čaputová, who, when she was
20:37performing her function as the president of the Slovak Republic,
20:40in post-mortem, mentioned two fascists,
20:43who also fought against the supporters
20:46of the Slovak National Uprising,
20:49and voted for people who collaborated
20:52with the supporters of the Slovak National Uprising.
20:55And today there is a man who has a symbol,
20:58a Nazi symbol, of the attack unit Edel Weiss,
21:01which captured Slovakian citizens
21:04during the Second World War,
21:07basically until 1945, when they were not
21:10pushed out by the Soviet army,
21:13when they retreated to the west, to Germany.
21:16So these are the obedient people.
21:19And I ask myself, why do all the democrats
21:22smell the supporters of the Nazis,
21:25or mention the Nazis,
21:28or doubt the Slovak National Uprising?
21:34Let us hear your questions.
21:37I don't quite understand why we are talking about this,
21:40why this is not a matter for the police,
21:43why this is not a matter for our president,
21:46because you say that there are dangerous people here,
21:49who may be in danger today, and I don't like that.
21:52Why?
21:55Mr. Serebriakov, I don't quite understand
21:58why we shouldn't be talking here,
22:01why we shouldn't, we, politicians,
22:04inform the public.
22:07Why do you make contributions to politics?
22:10This is a part of politics.
22:13There is a chairman of the political party,
22:16and you ask me not to talk about it,
22:19what do you want me to say?
22:22You say that this person poses a threat
22:25to the prime minister today,
22:28I would expect you to tell me that he is detained,
22:31or something like that.
22:34Because I have information that the prosecutor
22:37did not agree to his detention,
22:40and because this whole action is still considered
22:43as a criminal act.
22:46Just as they did this from the government office,
22:49when Mr. Matović climbed on the fence and was carrying
22:52a gun, if he were an ordinary citizen,
22:55he would have already been arrested.
22:58Mr. Matović is a criminal, who was solved
23:01by the police.
23:04And this person, since he was not at home,
23:07no one contacted him, no one cared about him.
23:10So this is the difference. Write about it.
23:13So someone explained to you at the Security Council
23:16the difference, why you perceive him as a threat,
23:19and not as a criminal.
23:22As I said, the chairman of the government
23:25will inform you more about the Security Council
23:28about this answer.
23:31Why are we discussing this at the press conference,
23:34a political press conference? Because it needs to be divided.
23:37There is a criminal justice dimension,
23:40where the role of the authorities of the criminal act
23:43and the prosecutor's office comes into play.
23:46And then there is a political dimension,
23:49which is why we are doing this press conference
23:52and we want to ask you to inform the public,
23:55if you have not noticed,
23:58there is a logo of the Democratic Party.
24:01There is a chairman of the Democratic Party, Mr. Nať,
24:04and there is an officer, who clearly sympathizes
24:07with the extremist movements.
24:10And there is a person, who publicly
24:13threatens the chairman of the government
24:16with a gun in his hand, that Robert Fico will go down.
24:19And this is just a matter of time.
24:22We want you to make a political appeal
24:25to the Presidency of Progressive Slovakia,
24:28so that the public is limited by such behavior,
24:31speech and statement,
24:34and not to ally with such a political party
24:37and legitimize such a speech.
24:40This is the purpose of this press conference.
24:43It is not our purpose to investigate here.
24:46The role of the authorities of the criminal act
24:49is to safeguard the security of the legislative forces
24:52in Slovakia.
24:55This is a political press conference.
24:58This is a political press conference.
25:01This is a political press conference.
25:04This is a political press conference.
25:07This is a political press conference.
25:10I do not understand the conclusion of the Security Council,
25:13but you mentioned the Democrats and the opposition,
25:16the conclusion of the Security Council, because you have talked about it for hours,
25:19you have shown it to the opposition leader on television,
25:23but what would you like to say about the conclusion of the Security Council?
25:25You will find out the conclusion, I have already said it,
25:28I repeat, from the chairman of the Security Council,
25:30after the establishment of the government,
25:32it was accepted, a concrete conclusion, a concrete statement,
25:34he will inform you about it,
25:36but I will allow myself another piece, you know,
25:39there were quotes of those threatening statements
25:42that appear on social networks in the eyes of individuals,
25:46even in the eyes of me.
25:48I have to tell you that until now I have been more free,
25:52I still go to the public, I usually go shopping for groceries,
25:56and I am aware that nothing significant is happening,
26:00but when I heard, even at my address,
26:03that everything can threaten me,
26:06I am terrified of where this society has become.
26:10As Juraj said a moment ago,
26:14you are as if you were deaf and blind,
26:16as if we were throwing a toy on the wall.
26:19Try to understand, even in the eyes of you, journalists,
26:21sometimes there are some threatening statements,
26:25and you do not react to it.
26:27You are simply still looking for a way to defend it.
26:31How to defend it?
26:32Yesterday's speeches in some media were about defending the whole thing,
26:35not about criticizing it.
26:37Is it possible for them to make such a speech as they did?
26:41That a person who returns to the victim,
26:45that is, a person who came there for life,
26:48is a man of hatred.
26:50I will maybe add the difference that you do not want to see here,
26:54you often give us the answer,
26:55that, you know, even directors express themselves like that.
26:57Well, they do not express themselves.
26:59If they use expressive expressions,
27:01that journalists are prostitutes or similar things,
27:04it does not make sense to stop them,
27:07because they are attacking.
27:09It does not make sense to kill them,
27:11to put them down.
27:12Have you ever heard that from any director?
27:15I'm just saying...
27:16I'm just saying what kind of...
27:19Mr. Serebriakov, once again,
27:22there are, and it was part of the Security Council,
27:25there were several articles read there,
27:28so that we could understand the threatening statements
27:31that are on social networks,
27:32and there was even a statement
27:34under which a specific person signed.
27:36These people go so far
27:38that they no longer express it anonymously,
27:40they express it completely with their own hatred.
27:43And we still call on you to do something about it.
27:46You are the ones who inform the public,
27:49who are interested in a critical attitude towards good or evil,
27:52and we do not need to praise the leaders.
27:54Jurej speaks well, we want to fight a political battle
27:56as the Constitution suggests,
27:58and with the political tools that belong to it.
28:01But we expect you to be critical of the opposition politics,
28:05especially when it is led by a form of hateful statements,
28:08statements that are tolerated,
28:10and which are then shouted out by those
28:12who master this rhetoric,
28:14and that you will fight against it.
28:16Otherwise, it won't end well in society.
28:18I am convinced that it won't end well.
28:20And the concerns expressed by Robert Fico,
28:23I heard him for the first time admit
28:25that he is basically talking about fear.
28:27And you are trying to bring it closer,
28:30I will not specify it now,
28:32I will not specify who the police are about it,
28:35I just want to tell you that these are absolute words
28:38about liquidation and the way in which this liquidation should be carried out.
28:42If you heard this, I would really like you to react to it.
28:46You are a part of the public space,
28:48you create a public image.
28:50And the politicians, yes,
28:52have to accept self-reflection in their statements,
28:54but on the other hand, you have to help.
28:56You have to tell the public,
28:58this is not how it should be, this is how it should be.
29:00If you will legitimize it,
29:02then we are on the best path to a civil war.
29:04So there will be increased protection
29:06of some members of the government, or maybe yours?
29:08It is already increased in some members of the government, 100%.
29:11And, of course, the investigators who are in charge
29:14of the protection of the constitutional actors must also react to it.
29:17But I expect that the police and the prosecutor's office
29:21will inform about some specific cases
29:24from the recent past,
29:26or from the older present,
29:28which are already being documented.
29:30We also heard some numbers there,
29:32but you will get a more detailed answer
29:35at the end from the chairman of the government.
29:37One last question, if there is a chance.
29:42I wanted to ask if you know,
29:44apart from what you have published,
29:46if you have any information
29:48about specific elections
29:50for the prime minister
29:53from this person?
29:57I remember the more specific
29:59statements from Mr. Bombic,
30:03which I had the impression
30:05would be handled in this way,
30:07that is why I am asking.
30:09You know, I have used it a while ago,
30:11the difference in approach
30:13between some statements and some statements
30:15is clearly visible.
30:17If I were to compare the statements
30:19you have made from Mr. Bombic
30:21and the statements of Mr. Timito,
30:23and we have heard very specific statements,
30:25there should be a command,
30:27there should be a home surveillance,
30:29there should be everything.
30:31Let's put it in a reverse image,
30:33that there will be standing
30:35with a Russian flag and an axe
30:37someone like Mr. Bombic
30:39and he will be talking about
30:41what this person is talking about
30:43at the address of the chairman
30:45of Progressive Slovakia.
30:47You would be crazy,
30:49you would call the Attorney General
30:51and all possible people,
30:53why this person is not buried
30:552 meters underground.
30:57What are you doing now?
30:59You are tolerating, you are not doing anything.
31:05Mr. Bombic is in the OSCE
31:07and this person is free.
31:11That is a double standard.
31:13Do you need any other proof
31:15why we have a problem with this?
31:17As long as Mr. Bombic
31:19cannot threaten anyone,
31:21this person presents himself
31:23as a great hero, a fighter
31:25against Robert Fitch,
31:27who will bring him down.
31:29That is what we have a problem with.
31:31Mr. Čakovadimík,
31:33you mentioned the same matter.
31:35I am interested in this logic
31:37when you show photographs
31:39of representatives of SMER
31:41or the voice in agreement
31:43with what Mr. Bombic said
31:45and you also answered his questions.
31:47Does this logic apply
31:49in the opposite way?
31:51I don't know, Ms. Editor.
31:53Did you hear what Mr. Gedruš told you?
31:55The essential difference
31:57is that Mr. Bombic is limited
31:59in his personal freedom.
32:01When Mr. Bombic presented his opinions,
32:03he was in London.
32:05That means that he could hardly
32:07hurt anyone,
32:09as long as this person
32:11has no idea where he is.
32:13What about Edelweiss?
32:15You in SMER, who are so sensitive
32:17to the spread of xenophobia
32:19and suppression of basic human rights,
32:21was Edelweiss OK?
32:23What did they do in Slovakia?
32:25If this is against SMER,
32:27it is OK, right?
32:29So, once again, Ms. Editor.
32:31And you say that he was shouting.
32:33He was also shouting
32:35the MP of the National Council
32:37for Progressive Slovakia,
32:39Mr. Sábo.
32:41And there it was enough
32:43that he didn't know what he was doing.
32:45And again, the difference is that
32:47Mr. MP Sábo is a constitutional activist.
32:49He is the MP of the National Council
32:51and he decides and votes for the laws
32:53that the National Council approves.
32:55As for Bombic, he is in the National Council.
32:57The legal office of the Minister of Defense
32:59represents him.
33:01Mr. David Wintner represents him.
33:03That's why I'm asking.
33:05It's the performance of a free call
33:07of a lawyer.
33:09And at the same time,
33:11he is also an advisor to the Prime Minister.
33:13And?
33:15The question is,
33:17are you still standing for Mr. Bombic?
33:19But we are not standing for anyone.
33:21We are talking about equality for Mr. Jan.
33:23We are not standing for anyone.
33:25Do you feel that I am defending Mr. Bombic?
33:27Do you feel that I am a lawyer for Mr. Bombic?
33:29No, but we have seen
33:31several high-ranking MPs.
33:33But we are talking about equality
33:35which is basically not valid
33:37as long as Mr. Bombic is in the National Council.
33:39We don't know where such people are.
33:41As long as Mr. Bombic, who was protesting,
33:43is in the National Council.
33:45As long as Mr. Sabo, who was protesting,
33:47is in the National Council.
33:49I'm not saying that Mr. Sabo should be in the National Council.
33:51I'm just saying that you should show
33:53that Mr. Bombic is not the only one
33:55who was protesting in Slovakia.
33:57Mr. President, did you explain to Mr. Kaliňák
33:59how he dared to do those bloody things
34:01instead of this case?
34:05Mr. Serebryákov, I'm just clarifying.
34:07Do you really think this is a serious question?
34:09Do you really think this is a serious question?
34:11Will you be all right if the minister
34:13dares to do those bloody things
34:15instead of this case?
34:17But someone probably had to do it
34:19when it happened there.
34:21He had to ensure that it got there.
34:23You saw yesterday that it is part
34:25of the problem now, Mr. Serebryákov.
34:27I don't understand this.
34:29I really don't understand this question.
34:31Because what Mr. Richard explained
34:33a moment ago,
34:35you ask a question
34:37and you already said that
34:39Mr. Kaliňák and Mr. Bombic
34:41were in some kind of relationship.
34:43What is this?
34:45Are they not in contact?
34:47Isn't Mr. Korčok there by any chance?
34:49I already understand why
34:51progressive Slovakia is going
34:53through this.
34:55He can accept Edelweiss,
34:57so maybe the name of progressive Slovakia will change.
34:59I don't know.
35:01But try to be critical of the same metric everywhere.
35:03And the question
35:05why did Robert Kaliňák
35:07do the bloody things,
35:09don't be angry.
35:11So in your opinion, can I do the bloody things instead of you?
35:13But you can't do the bloody things.
35:15It was probably after some agreement.
35:17Neither you nor I were there
35:19when it happened.
35:21I don't know.
35:23I don't know.
35:25I don't know.
35:27I don't know.
35:29I don't know.
35:31I don't know.
35:33I don't know.
35:35I don't know.
35:37I don't know.
35:39I don't know.
35:41I don't know.
35:43I don't know.
35:45I don't know.
35:47I don't know.
35:49I don't know.
35:51I don't know.
35:53I don't know.
35:55I don't know.
35:57I don't know.
35:59I don't know.
36:01I don't know.
36:03I don't know.
36:05I don't know.
36:07I don't know.
36:09I don't know.
36:11I don't know.
36:13I don't know.
36:15I don't know.
36:17I don't know.
36:19I don't know.
36:21I don't know.
36:23I don't know.
36:25I don't know.
36:27I don't know.
36:29I don't know.
36:31I don't know.
36:33I don't know.
36:35I don't know.
36:37I don't know.
36:39I don't know.
36:41I don't know.
36:43I don't know.
36:45I don't know.
36:47I don't know.
36:49I don't know.
36:51I don't know.
36:53I don't know.
36:55I don't know.
36:57I don't know.
36:59I don't know.
37:01I don't know.
37:03I don't know.
37:05I don't know.
37:07I don't know.
37:09I don't know.
37:11I don't know.
37:13I don't know.
37:15I don't know.
37:17I don't know.
37:19I don't know.
37:21I don't know.
37:23I don't know.
37:25I don't know.
37:27I don't know.
37:29I don't know.
37:31I don't know.
37:33I don't know.
37:35I don't know.
37:37I don't know.
37:39I don't know.
37:41I don't know.
37:43I don't know.
37:45I don't know.
37:47I don't know.
37:49I don't know.
37:51I don't know.
37:53I don't know.
37:55I don't know.
37:57I don't know.
37:59I don't know.
38:01I don't know.
38:03I don't know.
38:05I don't know.
38:07I don't know.
38:09I don't know.
38:11I don't know.
38:13I don't know.
38:15I don't know.
38:17I don't know.
38:19I don't know.
38:21I don't know.
38:23I don't know.
38:25I don't know.
38:27I don't know.
38:29I don't know.
38:31I don't know.
38:33I don't know.
38:35I don't know.
38:37I don't know.
38:39I don't know.
38:41I don't know.
38:43I don't know.
38:45I don't know.
38:47I don't know.
38:49I don't know.
38:51I don't know.
38:53I don't know.
38:55I don't know.
38:57I don't know.
38:59I don't know.
39:01I don't know.
39:03I don't know.
39:05I don't know.
39:07I don't know.
39:09I don't know.
39:11I don't know.
39:13I don't know.
39:15I don't know.
39:17I don't know.
39:19I don't know.
39:21I don't know.
39:23I don't know.
39:25I don't know.
39:27I don't know.
39:29I don't know.
39:31I don't know.
39:33I don't know.
39:35I don't know.
39:37I don't know.
39:39I don't know.
39:41I don't know.
39:43I don't know.
39:45I don't know.
39:47I don't know.
39:49I don't know.
39:51I don't know.
39:53I don't know.
39:55I don't know.
39:57I don't know.
39:59I don't know.
40:01I don't know.
40:03I don't know.
40:05I don't know.
40:07I don't know.
40:09I don't know.
40:11I don't know.
40:13I don't know.
40:15I don't know.
40:17I don't know.
40:19I don't know.
40:21I don't know.
40:23I don't know.
40:25I don't know.
40:27I don't know.
40:29I don't know.
40:31I don't know.
40:33I don't know.
40:35I don't know.
40:37I don't know.
40:39I don't know.
40:41I don't know.
40:43I don't know.
40:45I don't know.
40:47I don't know.
40:49I don't know.
40:51I don't know.
40:53I don't know.
40:55I don't know.
40:57Thank you very much for your time.
41:03I guess it's related
41:05to what the Prime Minister will tell you
41:07after the election of the Government
41:09in Handel
41:11about the content of Security crisis.
41:21From the Public's Resources.