CONFIRMARON EL BONO DE $70.000 PARA JUBILADOS
El decreto 965 publicado en el Boletín Oficial confirma la continuidad del bono extraordinario que se viene otorgando desde marzo.
️ @facupastor
Seguí en #ElNoticieroDeA24
a24.com/vivo
El decreto 965 publicado en el Boletín Oficial confirma la continuidad del bono extraordinario que se viene otorgando desde marzo.
️ @facupastor
Seguí en #ElNoticieroDeA24
a24.com/vivo
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00It's a new bonus.
00:01That's right.
00:02An extraordinary bonus.
00:03Actually, it's the same bonus that has been maintained since March.
00:06It was confirmed.
00:07Today, Decree 965 was published in the official bulletin, where the $70,000 bonus is effectively
00:13confirmed.
00:14We hadn't been announcing it either, so, well, at first, the minimum wage for November
00:19will be $322,798, which is made up of the minimum, with an increase of 3.47% of $252,798
00:30This wasn't announced, it wasn't planned.
00:33It's something extra.
00:35The bonus has been issued since March, at the same time, so, yes, we've been announcing it
00:40because I've heard versions from the president and the spokesman, but it's being issued month
00:44after month.
00:45But it's not an extra bonus.
00:46No, it's extraordinary.
00:47Sorry.
00:48It's the same bonus and it was announced like that.
00:49Barbara said extraordinary, that's why I'm asking.
00:50Yes, it's the same $70,000 bonus, which is repeated month after month, and which
00:54had already been announced by the head of ANSES in the presentation of the budget to
00:59deputies.
01:00It's the ratification of the bonus.
01:01The officialization.
01:02But my question is, why is it extraordinary if the bonus is frozen at $70,000 and it's
01:08getting less and less?
01:09It's extraordinary because it's not part of the AVER, it's monthly, and it's an arbitrary
01:14and discretionary decision of the executive power.
01:16It's not part of it, so it's not incorporated.
01:19It could be this month, like next month, but it's not.
01:21So it's being maintained, but it's out of the monthly AVER.
01:25I was surprised by that table.
01:27What is a bagatella?
01:28Sorry, ignorance.
01:29No, the bagatella is when there is a more technical issue, when there is an autonomous
01:34debt, when a small difference is made, if it is less than that amount, it can be,
01:39it is not taken into account.
01:41Before it was said that something cheap is a bagatella.
01:44Yes, yes, yes, but in this context it was not cheap.
01:46It may not coincide a lot in the calculation of...
01:48A word from ANSES.
01:49A word from ANSES.
01:50Let's see, going over this, beyond the dialectics, if it is extraordinary, if it is the confirmation,
01:55how much will a pensioner earn?
01:57It is the confirmation of the bonus, not to be confused, it is what has been given.
02:00The minimum pensioner will earn in ODIM 322,798 pesos.
02:05Sure.
02:06Yes, a bit like Pablo just said, there is an announcement that this bonus will be maintained,
02:12but well, until it is not made official month by month, they are versions.
02:16Yes, to increase that amount, given the increase in prices, well, that the cost of living
02:22is getting higher and higher.
02:24Sure.
02:25Tomorrow, November starts and the increase in electricity, gas, a lot of things that
02:31are fixed costs that we all have to pay and that bonus is worth less and less.
02:36Exactly, that is why, unfortunately, these announcements that the director of ANSES,
02:42in maintaining the bonus of 70,000 pesos, I hope it is an announcement that is reversed
02:47because it is unsustainable that this amount is maintained.
02:50Well, let's see.
02:51But there are no announcements about it, let's say, it is just an expression of desire.
02:54As it is.
02:55It was announced this month in particular because it was made official through the decree
02:59published today in the ODIM.
03:01I still insist on this idea, the announcement is that everything will be maintained in 2025
03:05without changes.
03:06It is not an off, that is, he said it to the deputies.
03:09But month by month.
03:10Month by month, you have to sign that increase.
03:12Sure.
03:13But every month the retirees of the minimum lose, I haven't done the calculation yet,
03:17but I don't know if you have it, but if the general increase is 3.47%, probably those
03:23of the minimum are receiving an increase, counting the bonus of two and a bit.
03:27As is.
03:28In this specific month, the effective increase for people who charge bonuses is 2.17 instead
03:33of 3.47, which is the people who are losing.
03:36It is what we always explain, Barbara.
03:38You have to calculate what percentage of the 100% of the minimum wage involves the bonus.
03:45And since that percentage of the 100% of the minimum wage has an impact on a bonus that
03:53is flat, you don't have to calculate for inflation.
03:56It is a lie to see inflation.
03:57Of course, because there is a part, a percentage of the minimum wage that is not updated with
04:01inflation, because it was just stagnant in March.
04:04Of course.
04:05Give me the comparison that we saw there.
04:06Can you explain it to me?
04:07I know you have four images there to be able to deepen.
04:10And in a little while, after the break, we are going to make inquiries too.
04:14Well, of course.
04:15Give me those plates, please, so that we can see them and Barbara explains them.
04:20Let's see.
04:22Yes, the comparison, Barbara, first.
04:24Very good.
04:25Well, this is to have a notion of what would be, what would have to be today the
04:30loss of a person in relation to September 2017.
04:34The loss that was unfortunately had and that has been having in these years.
04:38A loss of almost 60% of the purchasing power.
04:41Exactly.
04:42A person who charged the maximum wage in September 2017 charged 53,090.
04:49Today, to respect that, for that purchasing power to remain, the maximum wage would have
04:54to be 3,211,904 and it is 1,578,233.
05:01Yes?
05:02Good.
05:03There is a loss of 50.9% of the purchasing power in this period.
05:08The same thing happens with a person who on that date, in September 2017, charged 20,000 pesos,
05:14which is around 3 minimum.
05:16That person today charges 608,358 pesos, but to have the same purchasing power,
05:23of that loss in September 2017, that is, what I could, what I could buy today,
05:29having the same loss of that time, it would have to be 1,209,980 pesos.
05:35This is what deteriorated the monthly loss.
05:38And the minimum loss in September 2017 was 7,246 pesos.
05:44Now, the minimum loss with the bonus is 304,540 pesos, but for you to have the same
05:52purchasing power of the 17th, the minimum would have to be 438,415 pesos.
05:59This is to graph the purchasing power of today in relation to 2017 with the same knowledge.
06:05Good.
06:06The government's argument to support the 70,000 pesos bonus has to do, if we can go back
06:10to the graph, has to do precisely with the fact that those of the minimum are the ones
06:14who lost the least, actually.
06:16And what the government says...
06:1860, 30, that is, a loss for a retiree of 30% is strong.
06:23Beyond considerations, I say, the government's argument is, I have retirees who lost 50%
06:29of their income and who made contributions all their lives to have more income.
06:33Those retirees lost half of their purchasing power.
06:36Those of the minimum, who contributed less, only lost 30%.
06:41We have to match it.
06:42But a little bit in relation to what we were just talking about the bonus,
06:45in this year, in 2024, that was invested.
06:48People who charge a bonus, let's say from December to September, lost 6% of their purchasing power
06:55in relation to inflation.
06:57On the other hand, people who do not have a bonus recovered a little bit, 10%.
07:01Wait for me, Barbara.
07:02Yes, of course.
07:03In a little while, we will enable consultations.
07:04Of course, those who have called us, who have written to us, who have sent their WhatsApp
07:09and the doctor, of course, answers them.