Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 4/8/2025
During last week's House Armed Services Committee hearing, Rep. Robert J. Wittman (R-VA) pressed General Gregory M. Guillot about China's expansion into South America to secure critical minerals.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Mr. Chairman of Virginia, Mr. Whitman. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'd like to thank our witnesses
00:03for joining us today. General Gio, I want to begin with you. We had had some conversations
00:07about what happened December 2023 at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, where we had incursion of UASs,
00:14small UASs, for almost a two-month period. We got briefs about what happened there. They came in
00:21well lit. They weren't trying to hide anything. I felt bad for the base commander because he wanted
00:25to do something and wasn't getting backing from folks up the chain of command. We had a bunch
00:29of resources there where we could do things. None of those were used. If it wasn't for NASA
00:36Langley next door, we wouldn't have even had the sensors to be able to sense those unmanned
00:41aerial systems that are there on site. Let me ask this. We have, from a hearing then, asked
00:48for a priority list under 130i. What base is our priority? What's being done to protect
00:53those bases? How do we make sure those things don't occur again? I believe that our adversaries
00:59are probing, trying to figure out what we can do, what we can't do, and that's very telling
01:05to them what they saw that day or what they saw over that month. It was very telling to
01:09them that there wasn't the type of reaction that was necessary. My question is this. What
01:15has been done in the meantime for us to be assured that NORTHCOM and NORAD is doing everything
01:20possible on these bases to protect them from these UAS threats? What's our counter-UAS? Where
01:26are we with prioritizing these bases? Where are we with training our security forces on
01:33base to protect those bases? Where are we with supplying kit to at least the priority bases
01:39or have some network of equipment that's necessary to make sure we're protecting these bases?
01:44Congressman, since the Langley incursions of December 2023, NORAD, or excuse me, NORTHCOM has
01:52requested, and then last November was given the responsibility to synchronize the DOD and,
01:58if necessary, interagency response to counter-UAS incursions. During that time, we've conducted
02:07three assisted responses where we can use our new responsibilities to bring capabilities to
02:14a base, similar to what you saw at Langley, but this time with the authority to operate those
02:20systems based on our headquarters close ties with the interagency and LNOs to get the FAA
02:26and other authorities that are necessary to operate once they land. The responsibility for defending
02:34bases resides with the services and with the installation, but what NORTHCOM has done is proposed a process
02:43where we would bring in flyaway kits to supplement or, in the case where there are no capabilities,
02:51provide the initial capability at that base to defeat that. Now, we don't have those kits yet,
02:57but we're in the process of acquiring those. I would say there's certainly a sense of urgency
03:04there in making sure that we get that done, especially here at the Homeland. Sir, I share that sense of urgency.
03:09Thank you. Admiral Halsey, I want to point to a study being done or project, I should say,
03:17at College of William & Mary called Aid Data. Aid Data is looking at how China has dramatically expanded
03:23its footprint in critical mineral extraction around the world, but specifically in South America,
03:29specifically Peru. There are two large copper mines there that are mining at record pace.
03:35China is putting a significant amount of money into those regions, much the same way they did in Africa
03:42in places like the Democrat Republic of Congo, where they own 16 of the 18 mines. You know,
03:47we in the United States can talk about resurging manufacturing and building all these semiconductor
03:52plants, but if we don't have access to critical minerals and rare earth elements, those things to the left
03:59in the value chain, then we can build all the plants we want, but none of that's going to come to fruition.
04:05Give us your perspective on how you see the Chinese footprint expanding in South America,
04:10specifically as it relates to critical minerals and rare earth elements.
04:14And Congressman, thank you for that question. It's no doubt that China continues to or would like to
04:20control the abundance of resources and rare earth minerals in the region. We know that.
04:24So I think what we have to do is have a solution. Recently, last year, Exxon Bank was able to
04:30finance a copper mine or mine in Peru, but we have to continue to up that, right? So Office of
04:36Use Capital, Development Finance Corporation, we have to continue to raise the profile of companies
04:42willing to go down there. When we go to these regions, they know they have someone who's going to
04:46respect their laws, respect the environmental concerns, right? So we have to continue to get up to that,
04:50sir. Very good. Thank you. With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
04:53Mr. Chairman, I yield back to you, Mr. Chairman, I yield back to you, Mr. Chairman.

Recommended