• 2 weeks ago
During a Senate Banking Committee hearing last week, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) spoke about ways the Federal Government could incentivize local authorities to increase housing supply every year.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Mr. Kennedy, the floor is yours, sir.
00:05Thank you all for being here.
00:06Professor Glazer, you're head of the Department
00:11of Economics at Harvard?
00:14No longer.
00:15But you've taught there since 1992.
00:21I think you need to turn your microphone off.
00:25You did your PhD work at Chicago?
00:28That's correct, sir.
00:29How many years ago?
00:30You publish about five articles a year?
00:33I don't know.
00:34I've published a few.
00:40I appreciate your testimony, because you not only
00:42talked about the problem, but you talked
00:46about possible solutions.
00:50No disrespect to anybody, but revamping our appraisal process
00:55or title insurance or talking about power imbalances
01:02is not going to get homes built, not
01:06in a free enterprise country.
01:10Our problem is supply, isn't it?
01:12Yes, sir.
01:14And the main reason we have a problem with supply
01:18is because of land use regulation, isn't it?
01:23I've been saying that for 25 years, Senator.
01:25Yes, I agree with that very strongly.
01:27And land use, zoning, some would call it,
01:33is within the job description of some state,
01:39but mostly local government.
01:41Is that right?
01:42That's correct, sir.
01:43And Congress has a history, it seems to me,
01:46you can disagree certainly if you do,
01:49of just throwing money at the problem
01:52and trying to tell local government how
01:57to get more houses built. And local government
02:01takes the money and pushes back, because politicians
02:06at the local level, they like to eat and live indoors too,
02:11and they like to get re-elected.
02:14And they don't want to make anybody
02:16upset by changing land use regulation in a way
02:22to encourage more housing.
02:24Would that be a fair assessment?
02:26My words, not yours.
02:29I will not disagree with any of those words, Senator.
02:33There's a plan that's been talked about in Canada.
02:38And what the Canadians have said,
02:40they're talking about it, it hasn't been implemented.
02:42But the proponent of the plan, I've
02:46talked with Senator Warren about this,
02:49has said, look, we need to incent local government
02:57to increase housing starts.
02:59But we need to use a carrot and a stick.
03:05What if America had a law?
03:07Congress passed a statute that said, look,
03:09we don't care how you do it, states,
03:13but you need to increase your housing
03:16starts by 3%, 4%, 5% a year.
03:20Do it however you want to do it.
03:22If you do that, we will give you extra federal money.
03:27If you don't do that, we will take federal money away
03:31from you until you start doing it.
03:35Would that work?
03:37If you're willing to champion such legislation, Senator,
03:40I'm willing to be behind you.
03:42I think there are challenges with that in the US.
03:46The difficulties of taking away spending
03:47that was already expected may be particularly hard.
03:49It may be easier to do with discretionary grants
03:51than with spending that's targeted.
03:55I also think it needs to be targeted not
03:57to the state's level of production,
03:59but to production in the most productive parts of the state.
04:02We don't want California to meet its requirements
04:04by building in areas that are very far away from Los
04:07Angeles or San Francisco and so forth.
04:11But I think basically something that creates carrots
04:14and ideally sticks as well that tries to encourage
04:17states to do the right thing.
04:18And from my perspective, the battleground
04:20of affordable housing is in places like the California State
04:22Legislature.
04:23And I would love those legislators
04:25who want to do the right thing, who
04:26want to make California a state for outsiders
04:28to be able to say, look, the federal government is pushing
04:30us in this direction too.
04:32Can we just not lose our spending for x?
04:33Can we do this?
04:34And I think that would be very powerful in the hands
04:36of the state legislature.
04:37Who would be best to decide the most productive areas
04:41to incent housing?
04:43I would use Bureau of Economic Analysis numbers
04:45of output per capita.
04:47I don't think it's, you know, but this can be debated.
04:50We can, you know, lots of people.
04:52I would not hand it over to an agency, though.
04:54I would put it directly in the legislation.
04:56Do you think our problem in America with housing
04:58is caused by a power imbalance?
05:02I don't, I'm not sure I know what that means.
05:04Me neither.
05:05Me neither.
05:08Thank you, Senator.
05:09Thank you, sir.
05:11Right.

Recommended