👉 La jueza determinó que existen suficientes sospechas para imputar y procesar a los individuos más comprometidos en la desaparición de Loan Peña, manteniéndolos detenidos por al menos dos años más. Sin embargo, aún quedan preguntas sin responder sobre las circunstancias exactas del caso. Se espera que las pericias accidentológicas previstas para finales de diciembre puedan arrojar más luz sobre el asunto.
👉 Seguí en #Alerta24/7
👉 Seguí en #Alerta24/7
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00...pages for the preventive prisons of these people, one of them Monica Millapi,
00:09with e-mail to be able to re-establish the relationship with their small children
00:15who are displaced to a province in the south, in Argentina.
00:21Why doesn't the same thing happen with Audelina? We will explain it to you in a little while.
00:27The judge was able to determine, at least, that that accusation of the prosecutor of Guzmán,
00:34of the federal prosecutor who carries out the accusation, apparently has, at least,
00:41through what is read in the writing, clear suspicions to prosecute and prosecute,
00:46to keep at least another two years detained these people,
00:50who are the most involved in the disappearance of Lohan Peña.
00:54This is one of the most important procedural moments of a cause,
00:59and we are going to explain to you, with titles, in a sentence, so that you understand
01:04what measures the judge of the cause adopted from this dictation of processing,
01:10because it is different from what the prosecutors asked for.
01:13The prosecutors can ask, and in fact they had asked for several of the situations
01:16to which the judge now gives an answer.
01:19And some do not. And some do not. It is different.
01:22Therefore, it has its own criteria and its own assessment of the evidence.
01:27For example, it dictates the processing of the seven main detainees.
01:34Here we forget about the parallel cause, in quotation marks,
01:37the one that had to do with the ex-DUPUY.
01:40The seven detainees, the usual, the main ones,
01:45those of whom we speak for the abduction of Lohan.
01:48Preventive prison, with an asterisk for one, with an asterisk for another.
01:55What are the asterisks?
01:57Six are those who participated in the lunch.
02:00The asterisk for one is the seventh, plus one hundred, the commissioner,
02:05to whom they also not only attribute ...
02:08And we are going to talk to the doctor, if we have the benefit,
02:11the doctor Poser-Penso, in a few minutes.
02:14We are trying to break the silence in A24.
02:18And now to meet this dictation of processing,
02:22very important as a processual moment of a cause,
02:27to Commissioner Maciel.
02:29Not only what we understand is that he is assigned a covering role,
02:34which was what was always imposed on him until now,
02:36but also a role in the abduction.
02:39We are going to consult him.
02:41Let's ask.
02:42Let's see, Bobby, before getting into the proceedings,
02:45I also want to tell you what is established in this resolution.
02:48For example, that in principle there is no clue that speaks of human trafficking.
02:54This does not mean that you can see it,
02:57because it is a research that is in development.
02:59There is a resolution of the judge until today.
03:01We already had that anticipation that it was going to happen before the trial.
03:05The judge Poser-Penso was ahead.
03:07We thought it was going to be a few weeks closer to Christmas.
03:11Finally it is advanced and it is established, in principle,
03:15that there is no evidence to determine human trafficking.
03:19The possibility of the accident remains open.
03:25And one of the big questions we have this afternoon,
03:29we are going to try to answer,
03:30because we are not one of those who like to leave questions in the air without answering them.
03:34But we are going to try to answer it, and much more,
03:36if we are lucky enough to be attended by the magistrate.
03:39It is if with this photo, if it is enough for a hypothetical trial,
03:45to be able to say, it is clear the responsibility of these,
03:50but not to be able to give an answer to why they were taken to Luban.
03:55Is it enough to condemn someone?
03:57To say, these have certain roles that have to do with subtraction.
04:03They cannot deny that they were there at the time,
04:07that they deployed actions, that they omitted, that they covered,
04:12that they planted a boot.
04:14Everything we already know.
04:15But is it enough to condemn them,
04:17if a basic question cannot be answered,
04:20which today seems not to be in this writing,
04:23of why they were taken to Luban.
04:25Well, I don't know if to condemn them,
04:26but we are one step away from an oral trial with this resolution.
04:31Another element that caught my attention,
04:33going over very quickly.
04:35We can start now, to go through the document.
04:37The 1,000 sheets.
04:391,075 sheets.
04:401,075 sheets.
04:41Also, that they rule out, in principle,
04:43the possibility of an intrafamilial attack,
04:46the possibility of revenge against the family.
04:50Situations that when you start to clear,
04:52you say, well, then where does it come from?
04:54And suddenly an interesting term appears to analyze,
05:00because they say,
05:01Caillaba and Pérez would have raised Alohan
05:05in the context of a criminal act.
05:07We do not yet know if the possibility of an accident
05:10or of another situation.
05:12And this does appear in the cause.
05:14It appears in the cause.
05:15It appears in the resolution.
05:16Let's see how this evolves,
05:18because then the appeals will come.
05:20Let's start going over it,
05:21because if what answers this
05:23is as if it were prepared for this program.
05:25The who, when and where.
05:27Of course.
05:28The why would be missing.
05:29But let's start going over it.
05:31What does Dr. Cristina Poser-Penso solve?
05:34Decree the process with preventive prison.
05:37And look at the numbering,
05:38because you will see some names
05:40that maybe later make noise.
05:43Bernardino Antonio Benítez,
05:45Daniel Oscar Ramírez,
05:46Esfierrito Ramírez,
05:47his wife,
05:48Mónica del Carmen Millapi,
05:49Laudelina Peña,
05:51María Victoria Caillaba
05:52and Carlos Guido Pérez,
05:53whose other conditions.
05:55And there we start with the whole question
05:56sometimes of formalism and technicisms.
05:58There are these seven.
05:59Yes.
06:00There are these seven.
06:01Actually, there are six.
06:02There are six.
06:03Because what is missing, where is it?
06:04Down there.
06:05In point 2.
06:06Point 2.
06:07Proceed with preventive prison
06:08to Walter Adrian Maceil.
06:09Those six are those of the lunch.
06:12He was not at lunch,
06:13but he is the commissioner.
06:14To find him,
06:15material author,
06:16criminally liable.
06:18And here the novelty,
06:19to see if we are interpreting it well,
06:21we are going to ask the judge.
06:23The crime of alleged subtraction,
06:26concealment of less than 10 years
06:28in ideal competition with this situation.
06:31This is what we had of Maceil.
06:33The cover-up.
06:35The cover-up.
06:36Now, is he also responsible for the subtraction?
06:40Did he know in advance?
06:42Or around here,
06:43in the legal writing of a legal technicism.
06:46Now, in a while,
06:47we also review it with Fito Baquet.
06:49In reality, there is the cover-up
06:51and it is a formality that is expressed in this way.
06:54This is not minor.
06:55Because if they also assign the commissioner
06:58the maneuver of subtraction,
07:00well, then here we have to be talking
07:02about a criminal organization
07:03that already knew that in that lunch
07:06they were going to take a minor.
07:07We continue with what the judge resolves
07:11for being pensive,
07:12what was the temperament of his resolution.
07:15And it is also clear
07:17that evidently the judge believed one Laudelina,
07:20but there are other things that appear, right?
07:21Exactly.
07:22It is important to say this
07:23because the issue of the booty appears,
07:25the issue of the threats
07:27and the situation that leaves us open
07:30the possibility, as I was telling you,
07:32that the accidental experiences
07:34that are going to appear
07:35in the last week of December
07:37can confirm or not
07:39that version that Laudelina herself
07:41had given between roosters and midnight.
07:45I mean, when Laudelina appears,
07:48look now when we see,
07:49let's analyze why they end up
07:51doing the prevention of Laudelina,
07:54her ability to somehow confuse,
07:58to manipulate the cause
08:00and that's why she ends up being arrested.
08:03In addition to that, because she has links
08:05with her children through teleconferences
08:07by at least some cell phone
08:10or something from yesterday's prison.
08:12We have the bases of a couple more points
08:13that are important.
08:14Yes.
08:15We are already in contact
08:16with a note there, hooked.
08:18Ratify again.
08:19Here he answers us something,
08:20you as citizens and us as journalists
08:22that we have been claiming.
08:23Yes.
08:24The need to maintain,
08:25maintain, because we told the judges,
08:28yes, how long can you keep
08:30people arrested
08:31without defining their situation?
08:33Well, keep the effective preventive prison
08:36of the detainees
08:37and here we review names.
08:39Benitez, Peña, Caixaba,
08:43Pérez, Ramírez and Maciel.
08:46Peña is Laudelina.
08:47Yes, Laudelina Peña.
08:48And here someone is missing,
08:49because you say, you go fast,
08:51but stop, who is missing?
08:52Benitez, Peña, Caixaba, Pérez, Ramírez?
08:55Missing Mijapi.
08:57Mónica Mijapi.
08:58And that is explained later
09:00with the question of
09:02what gives her the love and generation
09:05grants her
09:06to be able to have the benefit
09:08of the domiciliary prison
09:09with all the requirements that this imposes,
09:12to adjust to the right,
09:13not to change the domiciliary
09:15if it is not stipulated.
09:17And I think this has to do,
09:18and we are going to ask your lawyer,
09:20with a bond with minors.
09:22But one says, hey,
09:23she is not the only one who is a mother
09:25of minors.
09:26Also Laudelina.
09:27However, one is given
09:28and the other is not.
09:29And this must have an explanation.
09:30Obviously, she could not have contact
09:32during this whole process,
09:34Mijapi with her children
09:35through her phones,
09:37as if she could do it
09:40or by the phones of the prison
09:42or by some personal device
09:44with which she could communicate
09:45with her family,
09:46Laudelina herself.
09:47In fact, we had information
09:49that there was communication
09:50between Benítez and Laudelina
09:51in these months.
09:53In addition to what Bobby was telling you,
09:55very important embargoes were locked.
09:5720 million pesos for Caillaba,
09:5820 million pesos for Pérez,
10:008 million pesos for Maciel
10:02and 1 million pesos
10:03for the rest of the detainees.