• 4 months ago
On "Forbes Newsroom," Chris Cillizza, political commentator and Senior Adviser to the DGA Group, discussed Vice President Kamala Harris's potential running mates as the list narrows to Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-PA) and Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN).

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Hi, everybody. I'm Brittany Lewis with Forbes Breaking News. Joining me now is Chris Eliza,
00:07political commentator and senior advisor with DGA Group. Chris, thank you so much for joining
00:12me. Thrilled to be out. Thanks for having me.
00:15News is changing by the moment. So as of now, as we sit here, Reuters just reported that
00:21the shortlist for Vice President Kamala Harris's vice president is down to Governor Josh Shapiro
00:27of Pennsylvania and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. Before we get into the pros and the
00:32cons of that list, I want to talk about who's not on it. And that's Arizona Senator Mark
00:38Kelly. Why do you think why do you think he didn't make the cut here?
00:44Shortlists keep getting shorter, right? We went from three to two. I think that Mark
00:48Kelly, look, on paper, he seems to me to be one of the stronger nominees. He's a former
00:56military. He was a NASA astronaut. He's married to Gabby Giffords, former Arizona congresswoman
01:01who became one of the faces of gun control in this country after she was almost killed
01:06in a incident during her campaign. He's from Arizona, which we know is the swing state.
01:11The issue for me is that, you know, campaigns are not fought on paper. And Mark Kelly is
01:16not super charismatic. I don't think picking Mark Kelly gets anyone to feel any particular
01:22way, good or bad. I guess you could argue that the fact that he doesn't move the needle
01:26all that much either way isn't the worst thing. But I just don't think it's someone who it's
01:31going to inject more energy into the campaign. That's sort of my guess of why he wound up
01:38not making it. The other thing, too, is I think Arizona is going to be a little bit
01:42of a stretch for the Harris campaign. They could win, but I think it's going to be a
01:45stretch. And they probably getting rid of Kelly is probably acknowledgement of that.
01:50So let's just talk about numbers here for a second, because Kelly's from Arizona that
01:56has 11 electoral votes. Shapiro's from Pennsylvania that has 19 electoral votes and Walsh's from
02:02Minnesota. That's 10. So who do you think or which state rather matters the most in
02:10this election?
02:11Yeah, well, I mean, I was terrible at math, but I definitely can tell you that 19 is more
02:17than 11 or 10. I feel very safe in acknowledging that. So you always want to go to states that
02:25count more, right? 19 electoral votes is still a very big haul of electoral votes. And that's
02:32why I tend to think Josh Shapiro is the pick. You know, I think we could argue that there
02:37are there are past 270 electoral votes for Kamala Harris that don't include her winning
02:42Pennsylvania. But man, there aren't that many. And I think outside of her inner circle, I'm
02:47not sure you could convince anyone that they are plausible that she could make winning
02:51Pennsylvania to me seems like a thing that has to happen for her to have a chance to
02:57win. It's not a guarantee that she'll win. But I think it's the most important state
03:02in the country for her bar none.
03:04Every strategist pollster commentator that I've talked to have said, historically, VP
03:10picks don't matter. They can only hurt not really help. A is it different this time because
03:16of the historic nature of this election? And B, what is the number one goal of Harris's
03:22VP pick?
03:24So let me do let me answer your question. The second question first. I think the number
03:29one goal of any VP VP pick is do no harm. You don't you don't want to make things worse
03:35when you're adding someone. Plus, it's her only big decision that she gets to make as
03:40a candidate for president, right? This is she can talk about all the policy she believes
03:44in. She can talk about the things she's done as VP. But as the presidential nominee, you
03:48really only get to make one big choice. And it's this. So you want ultimately it to not
03:53be a problem.
03:55Do I think the VP pick could matter? I would say it matters both good and bad at the margins.
04:02I think the truth of the matter is most people vote for the top of the ticket. I always say
04:06if you're a big time recruit, for example, in college basketball, if you go to the program
04:13and you really like the assistant coach, but you hate the head coach, you're probably
04:17not going to go there, right? So it can be additive. If you like the assistant and you
04:22like the head coach, maybe that makes you a little bit more likely to go to that school.
04:27That's how I think of VP picks. They're the assistant coach. You're probably not making
04:32your final decision based on that. But could it matter at the margin? I do think it could
04:37particularly when we're talking about a race in Pennsylvania. That's you know, it's a one
04:42point race. It's a two point race, depending on what polls you see. But it's going to be
04:46very close. I don't think that if Kamala Harris picks Josh Shapiro, all of a sudden she wins
04:51Pennsylvania 60 to 40, right? That's not going to happen. But if it's a 50, 48 race, could
04:58he make a point difference? Sure. He's a popular governor of the state. He was the attorney
05:04general prior. He's been elected three times successfully in Pennsylvania. He's at 58,
05:0860 percent job approval, including four in 10 Republicans, at least back in May, who say they
05:14approve of the job he's doing. So, yeah, I think it could make a difference at the margin. That's
05:18the key. You just rallied through a bunch of pros for assistant coach Josh Shapiro. But are there
05:26any cons when you're looking at him when he could be the vice president, any way he could
05:32potentially drag down that ticket if he's announced as the vice president tomorrow?
05:37Sure. You know, look, all of these people are human beings, which means they have their pluses
05:43and their minuses. There's no perfect candidate out there. If there was, that person would have
05:47already been picked. I think for Shapiro, the risk, I suppose, for Shapiro is he is Jewish.
05:54There are some people within the party and within the country who are concerned about putting a
05:59black woman and a Jewish man on the ticket. That is that asking too much of the tolerance of
06:04American voters. You know, very hard for me to make a determination on that. The other thing is
06:09Shapiro has been very pro-Israel in the conflict between Israel and Hamas, more so than I think
06:16some on the very progressive left would like. So is there a possibility that some liberals
06:23walk away? I guess there's a possibility. But to me, it's like the vote is really between Donald
06:29Trump and Kamala Harris. And the idea that young voters are going to say, you know what,
06:33because she picked Josh Shapiro, I'm not I'm going to go vote for Donald Trump. Is there
06:38someone in the country where that's true? Sure. Is it a large enough number of people for it to
06:43make a big difference? I don't think so. So let's talk about Governor Tim Walz,
06:48who wasn't even a part of the original conversation when it was coming down to VP
06:53picks, which seems like months ago. But really, it was only two weeks ago when Biden dropped out.
06:58He then made that viral comment about calling Republicans weird. And it seems like the Harris
07:03campaign really held on to that. And that is their strategy going forward. Just calling J.D. Vance
07:09weird, different Republicans weird. Now he is in the top two. So what are some pluses and minuses
07:15for him? Sure. He's from Minnesota, the Midwest. The election will come down to Pennsylvania,
07:22Wisconsin and Michigan, period. You know, if that's what happened in 2020, I think that's
07:27what will happen again in 2024. So if you have someone who can speak that language, right,
07:32who is seen as a credible voice, who can campaign actively in Michigan and Wisconsin in particular,
07:39I think that's an argument for him. The other thing, too, is he has a pretty impressive resume.
07:44Again, like Mark Kelly, served in the military, small town, rural upbringing, was a football
07:51coach, won a Republican House district when he was in the U.S. House, has been elected and
07:57reelected as governor of Minnesota. So there's a lot there. But I actually think you hit on it.
08:01Like, if you think about it, weirdly, Democrats have struggled to find a message that really
08:09kind of resonates as it relates to Donald Trump and J.D. Vance, particularly Trump. They've tried
08:14a million different things, and it hasn't really worked. But the weird thing did work at least for
08:21a week. And so I think they're thinking, the Harris people thinking is, you know, is this guy
08:26a messenger who can kind of break through and solve the riddle that Hillary Clinton couldn't,
08:32that no one in the Republican primary could either in 2016 or 2024, which is how do you
08:38beat Donald Trump from a message perspective and maybe walls that sort of, you know, unlock that
08:44lock? That's a really interesting point, because if someone were to be insulted, I think they would
08:50rather be called weird than a threat to democracy. I mean, a threat to democracy does carry a lot of
08:56weight, except in this instance, weird seems to be doing the trick. Why do you think that is?
09:03So, I mean, I've spent more time than I'd like to admit publicly thinking about just this is,
09:09you know, why do these things like Donald Trump calling the 2020 election fraudulent when there's
09:14no evidence that it was the January 6th riot at the U.S. Capitol? All of it. Why are those things
09:20things that motivate voters against him? I think the answer is that it's sort of baked in at this
09:26point that voters, whether it's the, you know, the 34 felony convictions, whether it's the
09:33bankruptcies, whether it's the stuff he said about elections and election fraud,
09:37they sort of like, well, that's Trump. You know, it just kind of like, well, we kind of already
09:42knew that about it. And it's hard to break through that sort of feedback loop. The weird thing,
09:51again, weirdly to me, seemed to do that. Now, it worked for a week. Well, you know, who knows?
09:58You know, and it worked largely against J.D. Vance, a little less so against Donald Trump.
10:02But, you know, I do think you never know what resonates with people. What I can tell you,
10:08I mean, I wrote and talked about this regularly when Joe Biden was still the candidate.
10:12Joe Biden wanted to make the election about capital D democracy. Democracy is on the ballot.
10:18You know, whether it's the 2020 election, January 6th, other things Donald Trump has said about
10:23being a dictator just for one day, that this is really what the election is about. Voters weren't
10:28responding. The Democratic base liked that message, but they were already going to be for
10:32whoever the Democratic nominee is. The issue is swing voters. And I don't think swing voters
10:36were particularly motivated by that. Nancy Pelosi, the former speaker,
10:41reportedly threw her support behind walls. As we know, according to reports, she was the one
10:47leading the charge in getting President Biden to drop out of this election. So how much do you
10:52think her opinion really matters here? Oh, I think it matters. I think my view,
10:59just a personal view, is that she is the single most effective political strategist and politician
11:05in the Democratic Party, with the exception of Barack Obama in the last 30 or 40 years. I mean,
11:10just look at what she's done. You can like her or not like her, but just look at what
11:13she's accomplished. So I think it matters. Do I think that Kamala Harris decides who she wants
11:22based on who Nancy Pelosi says? Probably not. But I do think you have to listen to Nancy Pelosi's
11:28sort of political ear, because I think that ear has been proven over the years to be very,
11:33very effective. But politicians, particularly when you're talking about a running mate,
11:38it's a very personal decision. I think we tend to analyze it based on, do they agree on policy?
11:44Will they help in a swing state? And I think it's like that, too. I think politicians think like
11:49that to an extent. I also think it's kind of a personal decision. Can I campaign with this person
11:55for the next four months? If we win, can I deal with this person for the next four years? You know,
12:01being my second in command, but probably wanting to take my job at some point. So it's a very,
12:06you know, it's politics is more relationship driven than I think we sort of give credit for.
12:11It's not just this dry numbers driven conversation. A lot of it's about, do I like this person? Do I
12:18think this person will support me in what I want to do? Do I think this person will help me win?
12:23Within the past two weeks, Vice President Kamala Harris has seen historic fundraising numbers.
12:29Her campaign has been called Brat. She's got that Gen Z embrace on social media.
12:34There's been a lot of talk about her VP pick. Once this is once the pick is picked, do you
12:41think that this honeymoon phase is going to end and then there's going to be more serious
12:45conversations solely on the policy? What the what an administration with Harris at the top
12:51of the ticket is going to look like? Good question, because the other thing I think
12:56you have to factor into that is the Democratic Convention starts August 19. So, you know,
13:01really, we're two weeks from today. So realistically, we're kind of looking at a
13:05two week window. Harris and whoever this VP pick will be, will campaign across the country over
13:12this coming week that will get a significant amount of positive attention unless they do
13:16something dumb. I mean, it should be a pretty easy rollout in swing states. And then you're
13:22a week away from the Democratic National Convention, which, you know, just like the
13:25Republican Convention was last month is basically sort of a four day long message opportunity for
13:30Democrats, right? That said, look, I covered the 2020 presidential race, the primary,
13:39she was not a great candidate. She took a number of positions in that race on fracking on Medicare
13:46for all on mandatory buyback of assault weapons on other things that she has since reversed,
13:51but she was trying to position herself to the left in that primary. There, to my mind,
13:58there is some there there as it relates to excavating her record and saying, well, you said
14:04this in 2020. But now you say that. Do we get to that between now and the Democratic Convention?
14:11I guess I'm a little skeptical that we do given the truncated timeline that actually works in
14:16Harris's favor. Do we get to that point before the election? Yeah, I think we do. I think before
14:23November, before voters vote, you'll see a deeper dive into her record, her position,
14:29some of her flip flops on the issues. You bring up a really interesting point, because
14:34if we all remember back to 2020, I mean, she was a candidate running for president who didn't even
14:39make it to the year 2020. She dropped out in 2019. So do you think that she is a better candidate
14:45now in 2024 than she was in 2020? Or simply Democrats ran out of time and this is their
14:51best option? A little from column A and a little from column B. I think more from column B. Look,
14:58the truth of the matter is, you know, Joe Biden gets out of the race at July 21st. It's the
15:05convention is less than a month away. You have a sitting vice president who is a Black and South
15:10Asian woman. It's very hard for her not to be the de facto nomination. She could have not,
15:16but very hard for her not to be. So I think it was kind of like we're in we're in a bad place.
15:20We've got this person here. We're going to move this person in. So part of it's that. To answer
15:25the first part of your question, man, Democrats sure hope that she's a better candidate than she
15:29was in 2020. You know, early indications are positive. The only thing I would say is like,
15:36it's not that hard to be a good candidate if what you're doing as a candidate is going to
15:42impact campaign rallies where everyone loves you. Yeah. I mean, like, you know,
15:49once you get over to the public speaking piece. Right. I mean, if I had went to something later
15:54this afternoon or tomorrow or whatever, where there were 100 people all chanting my name and
15:58holding signs like Chris is the best, it's a pretty comfortable environment. Right. I'm not
16:03sure you could judge how good a public speaker I am or how good I am on on streaming or TV or
16:08whatever, based on that. So she has not done any major sit down interviews. She has not taken any
16:16questions from the mainstream media. So like, she's really not faced any sort of adversity
16:23in these two weeks as a candidate, which I totally understand from their strategic standpoint,
16:28they want to make sure she gets off the ground in the best way possible. But that will come.
16:33And I think that's when we figure out if she's a good candidate or an improved candidate or not.
16:39Right. It's not really about like, I always tell my kids, like, anyone can be a good leader when
16:44your team is winning 19 to 2. It's harder to be a good leader when your team is losing 19 to 2.
16:50And, you know, so adversity, I think, will win and that will come because that's the nature of
16:54a campaign. I think adversity will sort of teach us more about her candidate quality, whether she's
17:00better or worse or the same than these two weeks out. And J.D. Vance has faced some tough questions
17:07about past comments he's made about women in particular. Do you think that her VP pick is
17:12going to have the same media experience as him or they've learned lessons from the Republicans'
17:20somewhat sloppy rollout of their vice presidential nominee? Yeah, I mean, Democrats certainly hope
17:25that this person doesn't have the same rollout as J.D. Vance. I mean, Rocky would be a kind way
17:31to describe that. The thing I didn't understand with Vance and why I always thought that Doug
17:35Burgum, the governor of North Dakota, was a better pick for Trump is that, look, Vance got elected
17:39to the Senate in 2022, but he was a public figure for a very long time before that, largely due to
17:44his memoir, Hillbilly Elegy. So he had given zillions of interviews and gone on podcasts.
17:51As someone who talks a lot for a living, you too, there's a lot of stuff out there. People can say
18:00to me, like, when you worked for The Washington Post in 2014, you said this. I'm like, man, that
18:04was like a decade ago. But OK, so that's the same problem that J.D. Vance has in some ways. There's
18:09just a lot of stuff of him talking. And he is sort of a provocateur, or at least he was sort of a
18:16provocateur, you know, a cultural critic. So he was sort of playing that role. But that is not
18:22the role that you want as a VP. And I think that's why that rollout has been rocky.
18:27Well, Chris, we certainly have a lot to look forward to, especially in the next 24 hours.
18:31I appreciate you coming on with me and you are welcome back anytime. Chris
18:35Eliza, thank you for joining. I'm happy to do it. Thank you for having me. Take care.
18:46Take care.

Recommended