• 4 months ago
During a Senate Energy Committee hearing prior to the Congressional recess, Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT) questioned Shannon Estenoz, the nominee to be Deputy Interior Secretary, about water infrastructure failings and public cooperation.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00And we have Senator Daines. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to thank my co-chair
00:08of the National Park Subcommittee. Angus and I keep the National Park Subcommittee, we
00:12call ourselves co-chairs. No matter who's in majority control, we are co-chairs and
00:17that's the way we will continue to operate that as long as we're both in that
00:20committee. So, Angus, thank you. Thanks for your service,
00:26Assistant Secretary Snows, and congratulations on your nomination to be the number two
00:30over there at DOI. I look forward to hearing more today about how you
00:35think about managing there and should you be confirmed. I will tell you, last
00:39night I was going back and forth with Cam Shawley, Yeltsin National Park. He was
00:44grateful for your outreach to him. Angus, the co-chair of the Park Subcommittee, should know
00:50that because of the fast action of the Rangers at Yeltsin National Park acting
00:56on some credible intelligence, they prevented what could have been a mass
00:59casualty event over the Fourth of July holidays. They confronted a shooter and
01:04they they killed him. One Ranger was was wounded, thankfully. He's going to be okay.
01:11They had surgery, but I know Cam was grateful for your outreach to him and
01:17during the time, not only what happened in Yellowstone Park over the Fourth of
01:21July holidays, but also with the housing issues there, with the flood that we
01:25dealt with, and I know Cam's grateful for your outreach and your support and I
01:29am too. Thank you. I want to talk about the St. Mary siphon. You thought I'd talk
01:34grizzly bears right out of the gate. I will get to grizzly bears here, but I want to
01:37talk about the the St. Mary siphon failure. This includes the the Bureau of
01:45Reclamation in terms of what we need to do to recover. It's currently working to
01:50address the catastrophic failure. We had two siphons in the St. Mary River which
01:56provide water essentially irrigators at Montez Highline. If confirmed, will you
02:01work with Reclamation, the farmers and ranchers on the Highline? The Highline is
02:05the northern part of our state up close to the Canadian border. It's very arid.
02:09It's dry. We depend on on water to stay alive up there and the irrigation
02:16systems in the St. Mary's infrastructure. I just want to get your
02:20commitment that you would work with us and use all available resource at your
02:24disposal to replace these siphons and ensure the work is done as quickly as
02:30possible. Senator, I appreciate the question and I'm sorry to hear
02:36that we have a water management infrastructure failure. No one knows
02:39how serious those are better than I do and if I am confirmed, I absolutely will
02:43work with you and with BOR to ensure that we're addressing that issue
02:47adequately. Yeah, this is one of the situations where you can't miss one
02:50irrigation season. Right now we've got high temperatures. We've had a cool, we
02:53had a cool June and July and suddenly the temperature spikes. July in Montana, it's
02:57higher temperatures and it gets to be very... And Senator, I'm sorry, may I just
03:01quickly, may I thank you for acknowledging the incident in Yellowstone
03:07and let me just say to the committee, Senator Daines is correct. The bravery of
03:13our law enforcement officers in Yellowstone did indeed likely prevent a
03:18disaster and potentially a mass casualty event. It is true that one of
03:22our officers was shot. A very young officer. He is going to be okay.
03:28He's with his family now and if Senator Risch was here, I would
03:33thank him because our officer was flown to Idaho Falls and the medical
03:38professionals in Idaho cared for him and we're very grateful for
03:41that. So thank you for raising that. Of course, and thanks for your outreach. I do
03:46want to talk grizzly bears. Okay, yes sir. Of course. So last February, of course, FWS
03:52initiated not a 17-month status review. It's called a 12-month status review for
04:00a reason. If they were to initiate a 17-month status review, we'd be expecting
04:04the result here this month, but it's a 12-month status review. So, you know, the
04:11data is very compelling in terms of where the recovery target is, where the
04:15actual populations are. My question is, would you help us and focus on getting
04:26this 12-month review done that should have been completed in February? Senator,
04:31so thank you and it's good to talk grizzlies with you again. And first of
04:37all, let me acknowledge that I agree with you 100%. Not that my agreement matters
04:42because the facts are what they are. The Greater Yellowstone ecosystem population
04:46is recovered. The numbers from 2022, 965. Not only that, as I said earlier, the
04:52Northern Continental Divide population is also recovered at more
04:56than 1,100 bears. And we do have this petition in front of us that's asking
05:01us to delist the GYE as a distinct population segment. It's that
05:05definition that, you know, we're working through. It's got, you know, we've tried
05:10to do that before. We've tried to do that twice before and the courts have
05:13rejected it. And so we're working through that. We're working through our delisting
05:17criteria. And in the meantime, I want to say, because I didn't say it earlier when
05:21we were chatting about grizzlies, I just I need to say for the record how
05:26grateful we are to both Montana and Wyoming for the stewardship of grizzly
05:30bears. And grizzly bears are doing well in those states because the states are
05:35taking good care of grizzly bears. And we know that. Um, and then I also want
05:39to say for the record that, um, we want grizzlies to be recovered and delisted.
05:46I say that with without reservation. We want that. I want that for all of our
05:50listed species, right? A delisting is a celebration. It's but as I mentioned in
05:56the in the E. S. A. The path that you used to get there also matters. It's
06:01not just the listing decision. It's the path you take. That's often what courts
06:05will attack. So we want to make sure we've got the path, right? Yeah, thank
06:09you and agree. But there's no reason we can't get this 12 month study wrapped
06:14up. It's 17 months. Yes, sir. We got to get this rapid now. You all the
06:20interior can decide to slow roll listening to the election if you'd like.
06:23I think that's a big mistake. I think it violates the integrity of this
06:27process. If we don't just commit to the 12 month, it should have been done in
06:30February. It's now the middle of July. Senator, I can assure you that this
06:35process is running based on on the what the needs of the process are. And I
06:40agree with you, you know, driving toward, you know, a decision. When's
06:43it gonna be done? Well, I think we're I don't I don't have I don't have a date
06:48for you. But as I mentioned to you when we met a couple of weeks ago, this issue
06:53may be it's in the top five for the Fish and Wildlife Service leadership. I
06:57can tell you Martha's been out to Montana and Wyoming now a couple of
06:59times in the last month. So this is a top priority. And and I want to stay in
07:07touch with you also in in in the days and weeks ahead. I'm just a little
07:12skeptical. I know it. I know that we're gonna see this get done before the
07:16election. I just think we need to get it done. I mean, just for the sake of the
07:18bears agreed for the sake of the process. I hope we can dissolve the
07:23politics if we might be able to sign and stay focused on the science and get
07:27this. I realize you want to get a solid review done so it protects ourselves
07:31when we get litigated in court. Right. But I mean, at some point, is it 12
07:36months? Is it if we gave you two years, I'm afraid you come back here and say
07:38we're at 36 months and still thinking about it. I appreciate that. I
07:41appreciate that, Senator. You're right. And and we have, you know, it's further
07:45a little bit further complicated because we have three petitions before
07:48us that are all related, you know, and so, um, so I appreciate it. And as
07:53always, I will stay in contact with your office in the days. I'm well over
07:56my time. And the chairman's very gracious. I just I got to talk the
07:59Ninth Circuit Cottonwood fix just one. It says, Will you commit to working
08:03with this committee to get this bipartisan voted out of here by voice
08:07vote fix to save our forest management industry in the West? Absolutely.
08:14Senator, you know, it's one of the great regrets. When I was first in
08:17front of this committee in 2021, you and I agreed. Let's work together on
08:20Cottonwood. Tried to do an administrative fix. Couldn't get that
08:23done. Then we I tried to, you know, I we tried to help and work with you
08:27statutorily. So, yes, well, and I'm grateful we've got, you know, I've got
08:31my colleagues over on this side of the dice here have been supportive of this.
08:35Now I think we're ready. We could use your help here to get this cross
08:38finished. Thank you, Senator. Thank you. Thank you.

Recommended