Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 2 days ago
On "Forbes Newsroom," David Daoud, Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, discussed the release of the last American hostage in Gaza, what's next in the Israel-Hamas war, and President Trump's trip to the Middle East.
Transcript
00:00Hi, everybody. I'm Brittany Lewis, a breaking news reporter here at Forbes. Joining me now is
00:07David Dowd, Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. David, thank you so much
00:11for joining me. My pleasure. I want to talk about the latest in the Israel-Hamas war because there
00:18have been some significant developments in the past few days, so I would love to get your reaction
00:23to them. Let's start with Monday. The last living American hostage was released. You're in Israel.
00:29What's the mood on the ground? Tell us about the country's reaction.
00:34Well, look, I mean, Israel, it's still a lively country. Life is proceeding almost like normal,
00:39except for the fact that you feel the war everywhere. You walk down the street, there are
00:43posters of hostages, of soldiers who have been killed, young soldiers. I mean, these guys are
00:4818 to 21 during their basic service. And, you know, hostage squares filled every Saturday. I was
00:56actually there when Edan Alexander was released. There is a sense of relief with every hostage
01:03released. But then there's also a sense that even when you're done with that, the mission
01:07isn't over. You know, you're watching Israeli news simultaneously, and it's, yeah, he's the
01:13last American or hostage with American citizenship who was released. But then there are Israelis
01:18who don't have foreign citizenship. And I remember Enet Tsengoko, who's the mother of one of the
01:25hostages, saying, well, what about them? Are they worth less simply because they have Israeli
01:29citizenship? And that, you know, that's that there's this desire to get this war done and to
01:35almost to get the hostage. Polls seem to be going in that direction. So it's almost a fixation
01:42on getting these. I guess now depends on whose numbers. You've got 23 to 20 living hostages left
01:49getting them back home. What do people make of Netanyahu's leadership right now? Because as you
01:56said, this was the last this was the last hostage with American citizenship released. What do what do
02:02people in Israel make of the fact that U.S. officials negotiated with Qatar in Egypt? How are they
02:08feeling toward Netanyahu? I think it depends. Look, the majority of the country, according to polls,
02:15is not does not have a favorable favorable view of this government, including people who had voted
02:19for this government prior to the war. You have a lot majority of people want a hostage deal at any
02:25price. I think that group of people is going to look at it and say that Eda and Alexander was
02:30released in spite of Netanyahu's efforts and that Prime Minister Netanyahu was actually hampering the
02:35return of the hostages. Now, Prime Minister Netanyahu himself is a political genius that we can say
02:41about him. And he was trying to spin Edan's release as a result of his policy of forcing Hamas to
02:49negotiate under fire rather than as a result of American mediation. Now, that will play to his base
02:57and will play to, you know, the Channel 14 crowd. That's kind of the group of Israelis that really are
03:03committed to the Netanyahu government. They'll look at it and say, well, no, it was Prime Minister
03:07Netanyahu's policy of pursuing this war until total victory, of forcing Hamas to negotiate under fire
03:12that forced Hamas to be more conciliatory, but, you know, forced them to give up this very important
03:19card in their hands. And others, say the majority of the country right now, would disagree with that
03:24because of their unfavorable view of this government. I want to read exactly what Netanyahu said
03:30about Edan Alexander's release that he said this, quote, this was achieved thanks to our military
03:35pressure and the diplomatic pressure applied by President Trump. This is a winning combination.
03:40And I spoke with President Trump today. He said, I am committed to Israel to continuing to work with
03:44you in close cooperation in order to achieve all of our war objectives, releasing all of the hostages
03:50and defeating Hamas. What do you make of what he said? Because you're right, he is seemingly trying
03:56to take credit there. Do people believe that Israel was cut out of these negotiations? I mean,
04:01what does that really look like? I mean, there is a growing sense now, various moves by the Trump
04:07administration. According to Yedi Otachonot, a major newspaper in Israel, Pete Hegseth was supposed
04:12to defense, sorry, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, sorry, I'm in all non-Israeli mode where everyone's
04:17a minister here, was supposed to visit Israel. And that visit was canceled. Simultaneously, you have
04:23Trump, President Trump and members of his cabinet or his administration in the Gulf meeting with
04:28Saudi officials. Today, there was a very dramatic meeting with Syrian President Ahmad al-Shara.
04:34And there's a sense of kind of winds of optimism blowing in the Gulf's direction or being led by
04:40the Gulf and kind of policies that the Gulf states would like to see. And there's no visit to Israel.
04:47And the Israelis aren't necessarily being consulted. There's also the move towards a deal with Iran,
04:52Iran that the president is pursuing. Now, you know, there is this idea of if Iran doesn't come
04:57to the table and give given to the president's demands peacefully, the bombers are ready in Diego
05:02Garcia to launch, except those bombers, as far as we know, have been pulled back. So again,
05:07there's a sense that Israel, that the Trump administration is trying to do what the Trump
05:10administration wants to do, which is to make deals, to get down to business, to pursue the path
05:16of prosperity. And Israel is being left behind. And look, that may be true in the sense that given
05:23what the Trump administration's priorities are now, President Trump, for all of his bombastic
05:28rhetoric, he's not he's not a warmonger. He doesn't like war. He doesn't like conflict. He likes to make
05:33deals. And he likes to make deals that he believes benefit the United States. And right now, Israel,
05:39given the position it's in, can't give him any deal. You know, and you could say, well,
05:43he wants to he wants the Gaza war over. He said that before even taking taking office. Israel can't
05:49give him that. Now, is that because Prime Minister Netanyahu is interested, as some will say, in
05:55holding on to his coalition and lengthening the war helps him hold on to that coalition? Or is it
06:00because genuinely the only correct policy for the future of the state of Israel is to pursue this
06:05conflict for as long as it takes to erode Hamas and force it to give up its governmental and military
06:11influence in the Gaza Strip? That's a question for, you know, for other people to decide.
06:17But the conclusion is that Israel can't give the deal, whereas, say, Qatar, Saudi Arabia can produce
06:23deals. And that that feeds into Trump's President Trump's instincts. I mean, should we read into it
06:30too closely that President Trump, his first major foreign trip in his second term, he's going to the
06:36Middle East, he's visiting the UAE, he's visiting Saudi Arabia, he's visiting Qatar. He said, I mean,
06:42the trip is focused on, as you said, business deals, not foreign policy. But he's not visiting
06:47our biggest ally in the Middle East, Israel. What does that say about U.S.-Israel relations, if
06:53anything? It's hard to disconnect the economic and the business deals from the political. Look, I don't
06:59know if there's an intentional parallel. But if we go back to President Obama's first visit
07:04to the region, it deliberately excluded Israel as a signal to the Muslim world that, look, we're
07:09extending the olive branch to President Obama's advisers who told him, leave the Israelis out of
07:14this for now. Extend the olive branch to the Arab world, given that this was coming off, you know,
07:19the tension between the United States and the Arab and Islamic world, given President or former
07:25President Bush's policies. Is there something in there now? Perhaps. We are not necessarily, look,
07:31what is the relationship with Trump's foreign policy. It's largely built on personal relationships.
07:38He really cares about the personal. And we know that during the years when he was out of office,
07:45he, you know, he was very displeased with Prime Minister Netanyahu for various reasons.
07:50You know, there was talk, reports that, you know, he was frustrated with Prime Minister Netanyahu's,
07:55what Trump put it, his unwillingness to pursue the peace deals that Trump wanted him to pursue,
07:59basically the Palestinians. There was frustration over Prime Minister Netanyahu being one of the
08:03first, if not the first, foreign leader to congratulate President Biden after the contentious
08:092020 election. And then more recently, there's been talk of frustration with Prime Minister Netanyahu
08:14for not having his dual union on the Qasem Soleimani strike. So there's already this kind of this built-in
08:18frustration with Prime Minister Netanyahu. And if we look at the advisers that President Trump is
08:24surrounding himself with, they're taking a course that is at cross ends with how Israel would like
08:30to see some aspects of U.S. policy in the Middle East. And that, again, that could lead to more of
08:37an alienation from Israel. And those same advisers would like to take the United States into a direction
08:44that is favored by our Gulf partners, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE. Now, whether that's the right course
08:50or the wrong course, again, separate question. But there seems to be that, you know, that direction
08:55in the administration to move the United States more towards an alignment with the Gulf and not
09:01Israel. Whereas, you know, now, the first Trump administration, the Gulf and Israel were almost,
09:06with the exception of Qatar, were almost fully aligned. Now, because of the Gaza war, there is a
09:12disalignment. So if you go with the Gulf, you may necessarily be excluding Israel. But Gulf comes with
09:18deals Israel does not at this moment. And there's a definite tone shift between President Trump and
09:24Prime Minister Netanyahu when it comes to the end of this war. I want to read something that Trump
09:29posted after Eda and Alexander was released. Quote, this was a step taken in good faith towards the
09:35United States and the efforts of the mediators Qatar and Egypt to put an end to this very brutal war and
09:40return all living hostages and remains to their loved ones. Hopefully, this is the first of those final
09:45steps necessary to end this brutal conflict. And Netanyahu said earlier this week that there is,
09:50quote, no way we will stop the war, even if Hamas releases more hostages until Hamas is defeated.
09:56So what do you make of these differing messages here?
10:00Again, they're almost at cross ends. In terms of if I were Hamas, I want to, you know, I just saw the
10:09United States and come to a ceasefire with the Houthis. Israel's left out in the cold at a time
10:15where, you know, right after Ben-Gurion Airport was almost struck. So maybe I give the United States
10:22what it wants to get it off my back. The last living American hostage. We know that President Trump
10:26cares about the lives of American citizens, including the lives of dual citizens and dual citizens abroad.
10:31He killed Qasem Soleimani because Iraqi Shia militias had harmed U.S. persons, a U.S. citizen.
10:39So if I'm Hamas, I'm going to, you know, kind of try to isolate Israel by no longer having an
10:45American citizen there. And then it's just between me and the Israelis. And that sharpens the divergence
10:49between President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu. Especially again, you're sitting as Hamas. I think
10:54it's a very strange statement to say that Hamas is acting in good faith or with goodwill. This is a brutal
11:00terrorist organization. It's an FTO. So I find that a very strange statement from the White House. But
11:05again, these guys are adept at creating this kind of impression about themselves. And you know that
11:12President Trump is coming in already on a platform that he wants this war over. So do you want to
11:17create disinterest on the part of the president by saying, look, we have no more Americans. You have
11:23nothing to you personally have nothing to seek here anymore. It's just between us and Israel. And that
11:28helps to isolate the Israelis. And then you have the Qataris working a different angle. You know,
11:32they have the ear of the administration. At the same time, they're one of the primary sponsors of
11:36Hamas, not just financially. If you look at their soft power, right, they are the spreaders,
11:41the biggest spreaders of anti-American, not just anti-Israel, but anti-American ideology through,
11:46you know, their large media apparatuses. You know, Jazeera is the biggest known one,
11:51the Arabi, Arabi al-Jadid, and so on and so forth. But they know how to play the angle. You know,
11:55they know how to play both sides of the coin. So you have Hamas giving up its last American
12:02asset, and you have Qatar, which has the administration's ear pushing in a direction
12:07that would satisfy its own interests, but maybe not necessarily our American interests in the long
12:12term. Do you think by Hamas giving up the last living American hostage, do you think by Qatar perhaps
12:20giving that $400 million plane, allegedly, for Air Force One, do you think that in tandem,
12:27they're almost pulling one over on the Trump administration?
12:31Look, I think, I don't know if I want to call it that, but I think there is an attempt to use
12:37softer tactics to appeal to the Trump administration. Qatar is excellent at that. Putting, you know,
12:43putting the $400 million plane aside, you look at how the Qataris have positioned themselves
12:49to influence not just, you know, we talk about Qatari influence in different areas of, you know,
12:54American public life. For almost a decade, they've been trying to influence the conservative side of
13:00the angle, including the pro-Israel side of the angle. We have a lot of prominent American officials
13:04that frequent visitors to Qatar that genuinely view Qatar as, you know, an uncomplicated ally, right?
13:13Qatar is a partner, although the Air Base is there for a reason, but that's one side of the Qatari game.
13:18And the other side, again, is to spread and perpetuate anti-Americanism in the region
13:23through its soft power apparatuses. So they know how to work the game. They know how to,
13:30they've built relations with the conservative side of the angle. And this has kind of culminated
13:34in the, I don't want to call it the more ISIS wing, but kind of the harder wing of the MAGA movement.
13:40And look at the interview with Tucker Carlson. I don't think they've given him any money,
13:45but they've bought him hook, line, and sinker through this soft power approach, through convincing
13:49him that they are an uncomplicated ally of the United States. And it seems like the Trump
13:53administration coming in now, you know, their ear is inclined more to say, you know, to the Tucker
13:59Carlson wing of the Republican party than say the Mike Pompeo wing of the Republican party.
14:04And the Qataris, again, have succeeded in pushing their influence on them. So look, $400 million
14:09plane there or not, the Qataris are working a very long game and it seems to be paying off
14:14and that our foreign policy seems to be going in a direction that they would like, they would like
14:20to see. Do you think from that perspective then that Qatar is an ally of the United States or
14:26should Qatar be an ally of the United States? I mean, what do you make of all of that?
14:31Look, I think to me, look, I'm obsessed with soft power. I'm obsessed with the idea of narrative
14:37because that, you know, that forms reality. No matter what you do in hard reality, I think
14:42perception more often than not matters more than reality. And if you're a country that is basing
14:47its regional influence, Qatar is a small country with a small population that has a lot of oil
14:52reserves that are going to run out one day. They want regional influence. They want global influence.
14:56And the way they're doing that is through soft power. Now, in and of itself, that's a neutral thing.
15:01What are they putting into that soft power? They're trying to play on pre-existing
15:05anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism, anti-Israel sentiments in the region. They're trying to
15:10perpetuate those sentiments. Again, not just the anti-Israel anti-Semitism, but also anti-Americanism,
15:16anti-Westernism. In the long run, Qatar is playing a game where it ensures that this part of the world
15:22maintains a certain hostile disposition to the West and to the United States.
15:28So I, do you call that a partner? I wouldn't call it a partner. Maybe they haven't attacked us
15:33directly, but if you're sponsoring Hamas, if you have relations with, uh, with the Taliban,
15:37and sometimes we use that to our advantage as the United States, but what if you're fueling
15:42the next ISIS ideology through all this anti-Westernism that you're pumping into the Arab world
15:48through Al Jazeera, but through other, you know, through other media outlets as well,
15:51I would, I don't know if I would consider that a friend, uh, right. If I were talking about a personal
15:56friendship and I had someone who'd never laid a hand on me, but the entire time was gossiping about me,
16:01I don't know if I would call that a friend. I do now want to turn back to what you see next
16:06in the Israel Hamas war, because Netanyahu, as I said earlier, he said, there's no way we will stop
16:11the war until they defeat Hamas. On Wednesday, Israel lost an air, launched an airstrike on Gaza.
16:18This came after Netanyahu promised escalation in the region. I mean, what do you make of this latest
16:23operation and what do you see as the next or, and or final stages of this war?
16:28Look, I think partially there's, look, in every war, especially in this war, uh, there's an emphasis
16:35on symbolism, uh, killing commanders, killing high-ranking commanders. If you kill Mohammed
16:40Sinwar, who was the, uh, the, the target, uh, of the strike, we still don't know if, uh, if he was
16:45killed. There's a symbolic element to this, that you are pushing the war forward, that you're bringing
16:49Hamas closer to dissolution may, may not necessarily be so, but it gives that impression. It buys this
16:54government more time. It, it is a, it is a win for this, for this government to turn to the U.S.
16:59administration and say, look, we're not just wasting time here with, with continuing this
17:03war. We're actually making, you know, making advances. We're actually succeeding. Um, at the
17:07same time, look, the, the, the Netanyahu government has said, if I'm not mistaken, that, uh, you know,
17:12uh, 10 living hostages have to be released and that'll result in kind of a similar ceasefire to
17:17what we had before the resumption of hostilities. Um, so I think it was like a 40 day ceasefire or
17:22something. Uh, if, if, if Hamas, uh, releases 10 hostages, it's not a permanent end to the war,
17:29uh, but it's something that would be kind of sort of a humanitarian lull with discussions for,
17:35you know, what would happen to the future, depending on more, how many more hostages Hamas
17:38would, would release. So there's the tough rhetoric, there's the symbolism. There's also
17:42an attempt to show flexibility because you have pressure from the American government.
17:47Steve Whitcoff's talking about ending this war. The president's talking about ending this war.
17:51And again, there's tremendous pressure from within the Israeli public, uh, to see the hostages return
17:55home. So you have to give into that as well. You have to, to, to, to cater to the Israeli public as
18:00well to alleviate pressure off of, uh, off of the government. And again, is that a tactical move
18:05to continue the war later on? We'll see. Well, David, there's certainly a lot to look out for next,
18:10and I hope you continue to join me and break it all down. David Dow, thanks for coming on.
18:16Thank you. Looking forward to future, future conversations as well.

Recommended