Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 3/31/2025
During remarks on the House floor Wednesday, Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-CA) spoke about congressional regulations that 'make life harder' for Americans.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Moore. Thank you for leading us in these efforts to help enlighten folks
00:05on what we're doing here in the Congress to give people more choice, more options and
00:10have them be more reasonably priced and available for them. As we are coming out of the Biden
00:16administration, we saw a lot of devastation to the economic conditions for families, for
00:21homes, for small businesses, etc. So, you know, in Washington, there seems to be an
00:26obsession with over-regulation and it does make life harder for everyday Americans. Under
00:31that Biden administration, the energy efficiency standards became weapons of control, driving
00:35up costs, limiting choices, strangling economic growth. Under the anti-energy agenda President
00:42Biden had, American families felt the pinch every day, every time they turned on a light,
00:47heat their home, power their appliance or drive their car. The so-called efficiency
00:51standards didn't lower costs, they shifted the burden onto local level wallets and bank
00:57accounts. Back in my home state of California, we'd see the impact firsthand as these ideas
01:02seem to start there first. Between skyrocketing energy bills and blackouts caused by misguided
01:07policies, public safety power shutoffs is what they call them, okay? When the wind is
01:13blowing and they haven't trimmed the trees in the forested areas around power lines,
01:17they have to shut off the power rather than doing the work out in the forest that's needed. But
01:22that's another issue. All of this causes families to have to pay more for less reliability in their
01:29needs. So this is the future that our Democrat colleagues seem to want for the rest of America,
01:34one where energy is not affordable nor dependable. As the conversions keep pushing more towards wind
01:40and solar, which are fine in and of themselves, but they're a tiny part of the grid, they're not
01:45a 24-7 available source of power anyway, such as we would get from nuclear energy, hydroelectric,
01:53natural gas, coal. Those can be counted on at any time. You can turn them on, you can use them
02:00anytime. Obviously with the wind or solar, you have to wait for the sun to come up, the clouds
02:05to go away, to stop raining, or the wind to blow, as long as the wind doesn't blow too hard, which
02:09in case they have to slow down and shut off the windmill because the wind might spin it off of
02:14its hinges there. So with Washington bureaucrats now trying to dictate what kind of refrigerator
02:19you can have, what kind of stove you can use, and even how long your dishwasher should take to run.
02:25I mean, most folks in their homes want to see that the dishwasher runs long enough to get things
02:30clean and dry. Same with your dryer, same with your clothes washer. What it takes to get the job
02:35done, not some arbitrary, you know, shutdown of when a bureaucrat decides, oh that's, you've used
02:42enough energy. So really it's just limiting options and you being told what's good enough
02:48for you, rather than what you actually need. Californians have already been through a lot of
02:53this, has been forced to live with policies that prioritize these whims of regulators over the
02:58needs of families. Indeed we've seen the elimination of many outdoor tools, gas-powered lawn mowers,
03:06weed eaters, leaf blowers, and I'll come back to even, they're trying to take away generators. Now
03:13how do you take away a gas or diesel-powered generator when the electricity goes off and you
03:20need something to replace that, at least temporarily. What do you power that generating
03:25vehicle with? It isn't going to be other electricity. Now some will argue like, well we need
03:30to have batteries where this power is saved up. Okay, well there's a lot of issues with batteries
03:35on what it takes to make them, what do you do with the metals and the materials from a battery
03:42that is now no longer useful, it has to be discarded, versus just having something that works
03:47at the flick of a switch or the pull of a cord. You can start your generator using gasoline or
03:53diesel and have great success like we've had for generations. But they want to take all these
03:58ideas away from, they want to take all these options away from us. And indeed they do many
04:04things for inconvenience and families, small businesses, and they also strangle our economy.
04:08It's amazing to go out to a tractor supplier someplace like that and the whole lineup of
04:12these outdoor appliances are all electric, it just happened overnight. And I don't know how
04:20well they're selling or how well people like them, but we've got to get to a point where we can
04:24overcome these mandates, at least not have them at the federal level for the other 49 states or
04:30whatever amount of states that are not following California. There's more and more of them seeing
04:34one to get forward with California's craziness. Manufacturers are forced to spend millions trying
04:41to comply with these rules, changing the dynamics, changing the makeup of how their equipment works.
04:48And so just take the electric car industry for example. I remember back in California
04:53in about 1990 the California Air Resources Board, known as CARB, pretty famous now,
04:58I believe it was 1990 they wanted to mandate that 10% of all vehicles by the year 2000 had
05:03to be zero emissions vehicles. And at the time all that would mean is like, well you've got to
05:08use batteries instead of fuel. So they were, manufacturers were standing on their head,
05:14the auto manufacturers, trying to figure out how are we going to meet this mandate in 10 years for
05:1810% production. And so you ended up with these basically glorified golf carts with batteries
05:25on them, using the same old battery technology we had, and finding out that you can't just slap a
05:31license plate on a golf cart and have a practical vehicle for people. So they actually had to relent
05:36on that mandate before 2000 occurred. But you still saw these little, you know, golf carts
05:44running around dealerships with license plates on them pretending to be automobiles that people
05:47would buy. They don't always know by making a mandate. See many in those institutions believe
05:54that well if we force the mandate then they will come up with the technology. Well battery
05:59technology still hasn't made a quantum leap into the future yet to where it can be
06:07such an incredible source and for long extended periods as really the previous generation. You
06:13know, I mean they got more experimental materials, they have different more exotic materials actually
06:18using now, but the battery life hasn't extended that much more than what batteries of 20 years
06:23ago were doing. So the more we hamstring the energy production and force business to
06:31form with out-of-touch mandates, the more time these businesses have to wait, excuse me, waste
06:38on developing technology which really isn't going to go anywhere. The further refinement of
06:44internal combustion engines has so far achieved amazing results with how clean gasoline and diesel
06:51engines are running these days as you know they have put the filtration systems and the fuel
06:57ladders on there and make a diesel engine run pretty darn clean. So why don't we allow those
07:02manufacturers to continue in the direction of making them even better instead of saying nope
07:07we're going to force you to stop selling like electric vehicles, gasoline powered vehicles
07:11in California I think by 2030 and you can't sell any new ones and let's take away diesel
07:16powered trucks. We're going to run into a real reckoning in California when these mandates kick
07:22in and there's nothing to deliver the goods that people expect to take the raw materials from a
07:27mine or from a farm or wherever to the mill, the manufacturer, and then bring a finished product
07:33to the store shelf and you go pick it up and bring it home. What's taking away these options
07:38it's going to be a real strangle on the economy of California and any other state foolish enough
07:43to follow what we do out there. So it really isn't about saving energy it seems to be a lot more
07:51about controlling what people do. The ideals of putting people in stacked communities and these
07:56walkable communities, transit communities, instead of letting them live how they would like to or what's
08:02needed. In my rural district I have in northern California the people that produce things that
08:07other people need whether it's timber and the products that come from timber, wood, lumber, paper,
08:14etc. That has to come from a rural area you need rural people living there that can do that and
08:19they need to have the vehicles and the wherewithal and the tools to do it. That all seems to be taken
08:23away instead they'd rather burn down those forests. So what kind of choice is that? People would
08:30like people would like to have choices where they can live as well as what we're talking about
08:34previously with energy choices and the energy using apparatus choices and those.
08:43So Americans deserve a little bit better than that a government that prioritizes really green
08:47ideology over their own quality of life because what you get right down to is that when these
08:54choices are taken away you don't really get much that much greener of a life of a lifestyle
09:01because there's an offset for taking away the power plants that we have. There's an offset of
09:06replacing them with solar panels that cover many many acres especially of prime ag ground like
09:11they're trying to do in central California in what's some of the richest ag ground anywhere
09:15in the world and products there that so many Americans have come to expect that come from
09:20California with these amazing vegetable crops, fruit crops, nut crops that 90 to 99 to even 100%
09:27of them are grown in California. We want to cover those areas with solar panels because the areas
09:31those areas have had their water rights and their water taken away because of more green things and
09:38more environmental policies that put fish over the needs of people. So instead we need to go
09:45the direction that puts energy policies that would actually lower prices, expand the consumer choices
09:52and create opportunities for American jobs and American economy, American prosperity and not have
10:00the continued stranglehold we saw in the Biden administration. So the work we're doing here
10:04along with President Trump is extremely important to bring these things back to the forefront of
10:09families having choices and the basics like their appliances, their automobiles, their ability to
10:17heat or cool their homes and just enjoy their life. So we will continue and I look forward to
10:23being part of the battle here pushing back against that out of touch agenda whether you want to call
10:28it green new deal or green ideology or what have you and move towards a future where families
10:34and not bureaucrats get to decide what works best for them. So with that I'd like to yield
10:39back to my friend from Utah. Thank you Mr. Moore for the time.

Recommended