Category
🥇
SportsTranscript
00:00But this doesn't help at all if the top or bottom referee doesn't have a call to review Mojave.
00:06There are plays that can't be reviewed. That, Enric, is not reviewable.
00:09But then, they arrive, the bar runs, but if the top referee doesn't call to review it, it doesn't work.
00:16Of course, Enric is reviewable. There are arguments to expel him.
00:20In the least of cases, the penalty should have been for the bar's officer,
00:25that is, the bar's officer, to say to the referee, I have to review the possible penalty.
00:31Now, that doesn't excuse the players of Celta to have stopped playing.
00:34No, of course not.
00:35Because they stop playing and the goal falls.
00:37Let's see, everything that happened, the referee didn't have to sentence the penalty.
00:40Because, in addition, the referees stop playing more and more,
00:43so as not to stop the game unless it is necessary.
00:45You stop playing, the goal of Mbappé falls.
00:47If later he tells you, look, you have to review, he reviews, he says, there is no need, the goal goes up,
00:51if he says no, if there is a foul, the goal doesn't fall, we are going to charge a penalty.
00:55You are all wrong. First, the referee should have marked a penalty.
00:57No, that's just what he didn't have to do.
00:59No, of course, it was a penalty. If he doesn't touch the ball and knocks down the player, it's a penalty.
01:02But the referee shouldn't do that, Fer.
01:03It's a penalty.
01:04What the referee has to do is let it run and then decide.
01:07No, why? If you are seeing that it is a penalty…
01:09So as not to stop the game, but if he didn't see it…
01:11But if it's a penalty, it's a penalty.
01:12Of course, but you put it there with disdain.
01:14Ah, well, he didn't see it, he didn't want to see it.
01:16Ah, well, I'm not going to doubt him.
01:19If you are seeing that he doesn't touch the ball and knocks down the player, it's a penalty.
01:22But the referee didn't see it.
01:23Now, if he didn't see it, you have to tell him, hey, there is a penalty,
01:26he doesn't score and it's a penalty.
01:28A quick question, a quick question that we have to hear from another star of the game.
01:32Cholo said a few hours ago that Real Madrid have been benefiting from this
01:36and that this has been going on for more than 100 years.
01:38It has surprised me a lot that Cholo Simeone says something like that
01:40when he, with his own club, is match by match and doesn't talk about the past or the future.
01:46They stole a Champions League from him, right?
01:48If you remember Sergio Ramos' goal in the away game.
01:51Real Madrid benefited from it.
01:53Like for two meters, right?
01:55The away game of Ramos that cost Atletico a Champions League.
01:59Do you remember?
02:00No, Atletico was winning.
02:01Atletico was winning.
02:02No, he scored a goal.
02:04Atletico was winning.
02:05No, it wasn't like that.
02:06Ramos scored the first goal of that game.
02:09Griezmann missed a penalty.
02:11And then Ferreira Carrasco draws.
02:13They went to a penalty and won Madrid.
02:14But Atletico lost the game.
02:16We don't know if Atletico lost the game or not.
02:19Quickly, does Real Madrid benefit from the refereeing?
02:21Yes or no?
02:22Does Real Madrid benefit from the refereeing?
02:24Yes or no?
02:25No, because they give it, they take it away.
02:26That's what I voted for.
02:27If you ask the same question to any big club in the world,
02:30a large percentage of people will say yes.
02:32If you ask the same question to Barcelona, they will say yes.
02:34If you ask the same question to PSG, they will say yes.
02:37Because it's the cost of being a big club.
02:40In Valencia, you had to see the goal as well.
02:43Yes, they just did.
02:44They had to score a goal in Valencia.
02:46That's how they benefitted from Madrid.
02:47They didn't score a penalty.
02:48They didn't dismiss Valencia's goalkeeper.
02:50They didn't score a goal in Valencia.
02:51Let's go to another controversy.