👉 Una nueva pista surge en el caso de María Cash, desaparecida hace 13 años. Los rastrillajes realizados la semana pasada señalan a Héctor Romero, último en ver a Cash y actualmente bajo arresto domiciliario, como principal sospechoso. Un nuevo testigo y pruebas encontradas podrían ser fundamentales para un nuevo operativo de búsqued
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00A new key clue in the case of Maria Cash
00:03and it has to do with the tracking that was being done during the last week
00:09in a radius of 80 square kilometers.
00:12There were going to be 10 tracks, Fito, Hugo, I tell you.
00:15There were going to be 10 tracks.
00:19But, already in the second track,
00:21the dogs point to something
00:25and there is a new witness who has not participated in the cause
00:30and apparently that key piece of information
00:33is going to be fundamental to request
00:36a new operation at an exact point
00:40where Hector Romero, who is currently in a domicile prison,
00:44who is the truck driver who saw Maria Cash for the last time,
00:50today is being pointed out mainly as the homicide.
00:54And the person who hid the body,
00:57they are looking for Maria Cash's body with these tracks.
01:01I told you, there were 10 that were stipulated by the justice,
01:05but in just two tracks, already in the second track,
01:09the dogs detected something and crossed information
01:12with a new witness who is going to take them,
01:15in principle, to an exact point.
01:18This is what we have so far, Fito,
01:20while we are trying to talk to the prosecutor and the prosecutor,
01:23who we understand are busy at the moment and have not been able to attend to us.
01:26Yes, Pablo, we have to make a story.
01:31Thirteen years have passed.
01:33Thirteen years with the same evidence.
01:38And don't come to me with the story that now a witness appears
01:41who has not spoken for 13 years
01:44and has kept his mouth shut for 13 years.
01:49First, let's remember...
01:50What do you think?
01:51What do you think?
01:52Apart from this introduction, what do you think happened here with this?
01:56Why 13 years?
01:57They investigated wrong.
01:58Wrong, late and never.
01:59Because they didn't see what they had before their eyes.
02:00Wrong, late and never, Pablo.
02:02Of course.
02:03I mean, you can't put a person in jail 13 years later
02:08with the same evidence as 13 years ago,
02:10because the family needs an answer.
02:12Of course.
02:13So, and it's not putting me on the side of the victim
02:16in spite of the defendant.
02:19Both have the same rights.
02:21That family has the right to know what happened.
02:24Let's remember that Maria Cash's father was killed on the road.
02:27Yes, on the road.
02:28Looking for her.
02:29And let's also remember that the Penal Code has a 12-year prescription for murder.
02:35So, you were 12 years old.
02:37Maybe, and only maybe, Villalba, the prosecutor,
02:41whom we are calling,
02:43explain to us tomorrow,
02:45and even if it's late, I can give an answer to the family.
02:50But here, Lohan and Maria Cash are siblings.
02:54With the dogs.
02:56Again.
02:57So, you tell me,
02:59are the dogs going to look for traces 13 years later
03:03in a place where they should have been looking for that trace
03:09for a day, a month, a year?
03:12Well, this is interesting.
03:13Let's say that the dog,
03:14I mean, for those of us who don't know,
03:17with so many years,
03:18it can't smell corporeal remains,
03:21because it already knows it has lost the proboscis.
03:23But of course.
03:24Let's see.
03:25I don't know.
03:26Fito?
03:27It could.
03:28It could.
03:29According to the state of conservation.
03:31Yes.
03:32And that it has smells.
03:33Because the dog detects smells.
03:36It's getting harder.
03:3813 years to detect a smell.
03:41So,
03:42at that moment,
03:43yes,
03:44they could have detected it.
03:46So, this witness,
03:47who now marks a place,
03:49didn't he say it 13 years ago?
03:51This witness never appeared in the case.
03:53This witness,
03:54let's see,
03:55the person,
03:56that's why I'm telling you,
03:57new witness,
03:58because a person appears saying something,
04:00which we still don't know,
04:01that's why we're calling the prosecutor,
04:03appears saying something that is consistent
04:06with some trace that the dogs mark
04:10in the area in which this man has passed
04:13and it is believed that he could have buried Maria Cash.
04:16But this witness never appeared,
04:18that is,
04:19he is not part of it,
04:20because no one ever went to look there.
04:22No one ever got up and stopped,
04:24Hugo,
04:25you who are with the technological experts,
04:27to observe the route of the trucker,
04:29who just now,
04:30after 13 years,
04:31with everything,
04:32as Fito says,
04:33with all the evidence in sight,
04:34already from before,
04:35it is not that now they discovered the powder.
04:37Things were there,
04:38at least apparently, right?
04:40In that amount of time,
04:41it is impossible to track anything.
04:42I'm not talking about the dog's trail,
04:44I don't know that methodology.
04:46Yes.
04:47But technologically speaking,
04:49it is impossible.
04:50Impossible because?
04:51Because what has been seen
04:53or what has been registered
04:55at that time
04:56is already trampled with new technology
04:58and with new clues.
04:59Of course,
05:00what did the prosecutor Villalba say?
05:02We have a specific piece of data
05:04that we must now study and analyze
05:06while we see the images,
05:07the last images were the last images
05:09of Maria Cash,
05:1013 years ago, already in 2011.
05:12Does it coincide with marks detected
05:14by specialized dogs?
05:16Maybe it has been...
05:17I'm not saying it,
05:18I said it, the prosecutor.
05:19No, Pablo, let's see.
05:20Maybe it has been with marks detected
05:22with dogs years ago,
05:24not with dogs now.
05:26In other words,
05:27maybe the dogs,
05:28at the time,
05:29detected something,
05:30somewhere,
05:31and what this witness sees
05:33coincides with that.
05:35It may be.
05:37I still need to have
05:39a direct dialogue with the prosecutor.
05:41Another detail that Villalba gives
05:43is the testimony
05:45of a find
05:47made by a person
05:49from the place
05:51who has no contamination
05:53with the case.
05:55That is to say,
05:56the woman must have found something.
05:58Yes, some object of Maria Cash.
06:00Some object.
06:01Of Maria Cash.
06:02It may be,
06:03surely.
06:04Of course.
06:06It coincides,
06:07not with what the dogs
06:08found now,
06:09but I understand
06:10what Fito is saying,
06:11if it is so,
06:12with some issue
06:13that has been detected before.
06:14The truth is that
06:15they have not gone to search
06:16that place
06:17because they did not have
06:18the logic of the trucker
06:19of how it circulated
06:20and why,
06:21one day,
06:22a month after the disappearance
06:23of Maria Cash,
06:24he stops in a place
06:25for so long,
06:26taking a few more hours
06:27than usual
06:28to return to his house.
06:29That is the logic
06:30of the trucker
06:31of how it circulated
06:32and why,
06:33one day,
06:34a month after the disappearance
06:35of Maria Cash.
06:36That's what
06:38the investigators end up
06:40seeing today
06:41as they analyze
06:42the trucker's route.
06:43It's incredible
06:44that this has not been
06:45seen before.
06:46This has a problem
06:47and I insist again.
06:48This homicide
06:49is prescribed.
06:50Sure.
06:51It can not be investigated
06:52because it has been 12 years.
06:54The prosecutor
06:56refers to a fiction
06:57that is to say,
06:58he killed her with alibis
06:59so with perpetual homicide
07:00he prescribes
07:01to 15 years.
07:02In other words,
07:03we do not know
07:04How? But it's with alibis.
07:06So, it can't be investigated by violating constitutional rights.
07:10It can't be investigated with everyone in jail.
07:13But yes, Pablo, if it is prescribed, this family deserves a trial for the truth.
07:21So, we are...
07:22Let's see, because the other day you told us this, Fito, and I'm worried,
07:26and I understand what you're saying,
07:28and I say, we would be with the incredible possibility, right?
07:32Of knowing who the murderer of Maria Cash would have been,
07:36but not being able to condemn him for prescription of the fact.
07:39And that the fact for prescription is impugned,
07:42which is an institute that comes from the Romans.
07:45It's not that it's invented here in the Code, no,
07:47but to say it, it's not in the Code of Argentina,
07:49it's an institute, the passage of time,
07:51but the passage of time is the 12 years that the prosecutor had to investigate.
07:55That's why I would like, and if I'm wrong, to tell him,
07:59Doctor, it's perfect...
08:01Villalba was always the same prosecutor?
08:03It's the same prosecutor, Pablo.
08:04It's 12 years, 13 years that he has the case.
08:06Exactly.
08:07What a headache for Villalba,
08:09the truth is that we are trying to contact Dr. Villalba,
08:12that we understand his good intentions,
08:14but...
08:15Without a doubt.
08:16We arrived half late, how is it that he did not realize?
08:18No, we are arriving late.
08:19Not half, completely.
08:20Yes, we are arriving late.
08:21Now, we have to see if we can give an answer to the family,
08:26and if the fact is not prescribed, judge him as he is.
08:29Let's think like this.
08:30What happens if we find remains of Maria Cash or objects?
08:34Let's remember that the case of Cecilia Strovki,
08:38which is the case of Chaco,
08:40the body was never found.
08:41It was never found.
08:42But a burned chain was found.
08:44Yes.
08:45What happens if we are talking about an example, right?
08:47I'm not saying it's this.
08:48A chain.
08:49A chain.
08:50Yes.
08:51Well.
08:52Do you have any...
08:53They are the evidence, Pablo.
08:55The evidence is that you and I enter a room,
08:59a gunshot is heard,
09:01I come out alive and you are dead.
09:03That's what it is.
09:05The evidence has to be consistent.
09:07The evidence always has to be concurrent and consistent.
09:10If there is an object of Maria Cash in the area,
09:14and there are human traces,
09:17undoubtedly the evidence,
09:20and then forensic technology,
09:21will determine that it is Maria Cash.
09:23Let's remember that all this new episode
09:25arises from a certain revelation
09:28that they were going to work on the cause again,
09:31or the cause was going to reopen at the time,
09:34and that's where there are some people
09:36who dialogue with each other.
09:38They don't say anything.
09:39It's no use.
09:40No, they don't say anything.
09:41The chats that were presented to us, Pablo...
09:43They are not compromising.
09:44None.
09:45They wanted to involve the truck driver's boss,
09:48as if the guy was there to cover up his employee,
09:53they didn't show me as I told you.
09:55The chats...
09:56You have to give me the audios, without editing,
09:59and we listen to it and we can.
10:01A chat, a cut,
10:04where it says,
10:05if this idiot sent one, pay them.
10:08What we all say.
10:09They are accusing my cousin that he killed one.
10:13And what would I say?
10:14Well, if this one sent it, pay them.
10:16Or I say, no, I don't think it was.
10:17Look at the mess we're in.
10:19They are all banal conversations.
10:22It's not like they're saying,
10:23yes, I knew he killed her.
10:26Then that's it.
10:27No, no, no.
10:28There's nothing in common.
10:29No, what there is,
10:30is the brother saying,
10:31this one sent one.
10:32But well, it's like saying,
10:33it's not like that.
10:34It's not like that, Pablo.
10:35It's not like that.
10:36Well, let's continue with this
10:38and let's see what happens with this new witness.
10:41You know it was very relevant
10:44the issue of the phone and geolocation
10:47at the time, in that year, 13 years ago.
10:50Because according to the words of this person detained,
10:54I don't remember the name.
10:57Romero, Romero.
10:58Romero.
10:59The truck driver.
11:00The truck driver Romero.
11:01According to his words
11:02and according to the geolocation of the phone at that time,
11:06it does not coincide with the schedules.
11:08And that was what led the prosecutor to sow doubts.
11:11But it's okay.
11:12To start investigating.
11:13But here I tell you something.
11:1513 years ago.
11:16He had the same phone.
11:1813 years ago.
11:19Was there the technology that exists today?
11:21No.
11:22The iPhone would go by 4 or 5,
11:24you have to see,
11:25but today it is by 17.
11:27That's why.
11:28To understand.
11:29Another case,
11:31the truth is that it would be,
11:33if we are faced with an injustice,
11:35because justice, precisely,
11:37did not do things,
11:39not because there was money,
11:42no, no, we are talking about something else.
11:44For fries, you say?
11:45For fries.
11:46Now, look at you,
11:47what do we say to society,
11:49to the Cash family?
11:51Well, also as a society,
11:53we want,
11:54we ask everyone to be arrested all the time.
11:56No, no, I don't say that.
11:57And there, no, but I want you,
11:58I don't say you,
11:59I tell you this.
12:00I say justice, at least.
12:01But it is that justice,
12:02when it imprisons people all the time
12:04for any crime,
12:05it is lost from being able to investigate this.
12:07I'm not talking about this.
12:08But wait, in this case,
12:09I say it's the thematic.
12:10In this case,
12:11there was never a detainee.
12:12No, but I say it,
12:13when justice is imprisoning people,
12:15not in this case,
12:16in another,
12:17yes, yes, yes,
12:18intoxicated by the others,
12:19the important thing is lost,
12:20which is the sight.
12:21Of course,
12:22the other day I wrote to a person,
12:23and I told him,
12:24I know you are busy with such a thing,
12:25and he told me,
12:26there is the urgent
12:27and there is the important.
12:28Of course, very good, very good.