• 2 hours ago
AP High Court Cancels GO 56 : ప్రైవేటు వైద్య కళాశాలల్లో పీజీ వైద్య విద్య కోర్సులకు ఫీజులను ఖరారు చేస్తూ గత ప్రభుత్వం తెచ్చిన జీవో 56ను హైకోర్టు రద్దు చేసింది. రెండు నెలలో ఫీజులను నిర్ణయించాలని ఉన్నత విద్య నియంత్రణ, పర్యవేక్షణ కమిషన్‌ను ఆదేశించింది. కళాశాలలు కోరినట్లుగా ఫీజులను నిర్ణయించేందుకు కమిషన్‌ అంగీకరించకపోతే తుది ఉత్తర్వులు జారీ చేసే ముందు యాజమాన్యాల అభిప్రాయం సేకరించాలని కమిషన్‌కు స్పష్టం చేసింది. ఒకవేళ ఫీజును పెంచితే ఆ సొమ్మును పీజీ వైద్య విద్యార్థుల నుంచి రాబట్టుకునేందుకు కళాశాలలకు వెసులుబాటు ఇచ్చింది. కోర్సు పూర్తి చేసినప్పటికీఆ పెరిగిన ఫీజును విద్యార్థులు చెల్లించాలని పేర్కొంది.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00From 2020-21 to 2022-23, the Government approved PG seats in private medical institutions and on May 29, 2020, the Government issued Go-56.
00:13The Go-56 was challenged by many private medical institutions and the same Go-56 was petitioned in the High Court.
00:194.32 lakhs for Clinical Degree Convener Quota Seat, 8.64 lakhs for Management Quota Seat and 50 lakhs for NRI Quota Seat were decided by the petitioners.
00:32All the institutions were denied the same amount of fees.
00:35APHERMC decided the fees without taking into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
00:43From 2017-18 to 2019-20, the Convener Quota Clinical Degree Seat Fee was 6.90 lakhs.
00:51From 2020-21 to 2022-23, the Convener Quota Seat Fee was decided to be 4.32 lakhs and the Government asked the Government to cancel it.
01:02The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
01:11The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
01:14The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
01:19The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
01:29The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
01:39The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
01:45The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
01:54The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
02:02The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
02:07The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
02:24The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
02:29The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
02:34The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
02:39The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.
02:44The Commission did not take into account the details provided by the institutions in terms of expenses and resources.

Recommended