👉 El abogado Sigal, representante de una de las víctimas, presenta un recurso para revisar la condena en suspenso de tres años por amenazas coactivas y otros delitos. Aunque no se prevé un cambio inmediato en su estado de libertad, una revisión podría alterar su situación.
👉 Seguí en #AndinoYLasNoticias
👉 Seguí en #AndinoYLasNoticias
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00I was correcting a little the lawyer Zigal who represented one of the victims
00:05for which Elegante was sentenced to three years in prison.
00:10Therefore, he was not acquitted, but he was sentenced, but an ex-prison sentence
00:15for which Elegante enjoys a freedom, a freedom somehow tied there with threads
00:22because anyone who is sent goes inside.
00:24Look, this is the document that was presented before the same court.
00:28Elegante was sentenced to three years in prison suspended for coercive threats
00:33qualified for the use of weapons, simple threats and co-author of the crime of harm.
00:37What the lawyer Zigal asks, the lawyer Becerra ...
00:40Excuse me, the intimate ... to whom he considers the intimate enemy, the one who pursues him.
00:45And this would seem like another battle of this war that Elegante and the lawyer have,
00:50but the lawyer Zigal with tools that facilitates the criminal code,
00:56all the judicial instances, presents before the court a resource
01:01for that sentence to be revoked or revoked to three years if it is effectively condemned.
01:07Elegante to eight years in prison for the illegitimate deprivation of freedom.
01:12Judge Raca had considered that the illegitimate deprivation of freedom was not approved,
01:18which is, let's say, of the accusations he had, the most serious,
01:22because they say that this elegant municipal employee was forced into a car
01:26and with a gun pointed at him, he took him to visit parts of General Rodríguez
01:30to free the friends who were kind of trapped by a municipal procedure.
01:35And why do you come back on this?
01:37Now, what Dr. Zigal exposes is that the law was misapplied,
01:41there is a misapplication of the law, a bad consideration,
01:45and that corresponds, because there are all the evidence that Elegante
01:49is effectively condemned for that illegitimate deprivation of freedom.
01:52In the resource that he interposes before the court, he realizes,
01:56second by second, what happened in that early morning in which Elegante
02:00first calls this municipal employee by the last name Torres
02:03to threaten him that he was going to kill his family.
02:05Yes.
02:06And later, that it is proven for Zigal that Elegante had a gun on top of the car
02:10and that he threatens him in all instances so that he does not get off,
02:14that an illegitimate deprivation of freedom would be marked.
02:17The court has to resolve it, but there are more instances,
02:20and it is the instances that would be hunting and even the Supreme Court,
02:23but what they ask is that Elegante, in the short term,
02:27be sentenced for that illegitimate deprivation of freedom
02:30to eight years in prison.
02:32There would be no discharge.
02:33On the other hand, the lawyer of Elegante, Dr. Locatelli,
02:36also presented a resource, but to be completely absorbed,
02:39because today he has a sentence of three years in prison in suspension
02:42that is preventing him, among other things, to get a visa to go to the United States.
02:45There, surely, Álvaro has some data, because he has a lot of activity
02:49in the field of music, especially in the United States,
02:52and for this sentence it would be complicating for him to ask for the visa,
02:56and anyway, as I was saying, any judicial situation
02:59in which Elegante has been involved, these three years in prison in suspension
03:04become effective prison.
03:06That is why Locatelli asks for the absolution to the same court,
03:11the same court 3 of Mercedes.
03:13But the important thing is what the court is asking for,
03:16and the defense of the law.
03:18What is the possibility that it will really advance?
03:20Let's see, in any case, it is the same judge who has to review his sentence.
03:25I believe that the firmest option is, from here to a year,
03:29that the House of Representatives review it,
03:31which is the one that can, in some way, make another consideration of the law
03:35and the application of what it has on the table, which are the files.
03:39Everything has been proven, the late prosecutor Villalba
03:43had done an excellent reconstruction of what had been that early morning
03:46of the year 2023 in the General Rodríguez area,
03:49for which Judge Raca understands that there was no illegitimate deprivation of liberty.
03:54That is why he is sentenced for minor crimes.
03:57The possibility that this judge, this court, reviews,
04:00it seems to me that it does not exist, but it does, the House of Representatives.
04:04From here to the short term, I do not see Elegante arrested,
04:08but a failure review could change the outlook for Elegante in terms of his freedom.