• 7 months ago
During a House Appropriations Committee hearing, Rep. Steve Womack (R-AR) questioned FTC Chair Lina Khan about robocalls, and cast doubt on the agency's anti-trust stance.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Now recognize Mr. Womack for any questions he may have. Thank you, Mr.
00:03Chairman, and welcome, Chair Kahn, to the committee. I know my friend, Cindy Hoyer,
00:09is going to talk a little bit more about CARS, the CARS rule. We'll dig into
00:14that, too, a little bit. And in your opening comments, you talked about the
00:19work that you've done on robocalls, on unwanted telephone traffic coming into
00:25the homes of everyday Americans. And congratulations on that, but you haven't
00:32fixed the problem, right? That's right. We have seen a significant drop in
00:39complaints, but obviously people, you know, robocalls are still a scourge.
00:42Is it possible that the reason you don't have as many complaints is people
00:46have just given up? It's possible. I mean, we have... I think it's probable, because I
00:53used to hear a lot from people, and in conversations, I still get comments.
00:57They're still getting this. So I would, on one hand, I would congratulate you for
01:03bringing the enforcement actions that you've brought on people performing this
01:08unwanted service into America's homes, but the problem is not fixed. And
01:14we still get a lot of concerns about that. So I'd be careful not to make
01:20that your calling card. You're asking for a 25% increase over the
01:25enacted 24 level, from 425 and change to 535, in just a few seconds, because I got
01:32a limited amount of time. What's the justification there? So the
01:39justification is that there are unfunded pay increases. There are higher costs we
01:44face because of inflation unrelated to pay. And then we also have to make
01:49critical investments. 25%? We also have to make critical investments in some of our
01:54tech upgrades. Sometimes, you know, we now have to analyze huge amounts of data.
01:59Right now, we don't always have the capacity to analyze that data in-house.
02:03We also need to do modernization of our complaint database, and so all of those
02:08costs are included. Again, 70% of the FTC's budget is our people, and so those
02:14pay increases, especially when they're not funded, do hit pretty hard. Fair enough.
02:22We'll have a lot more debate about the size of that increase. To another
02:31line of questioning, before you were confirmed in 21, your background was in
02:36academia, where you've argued in support of dramatically expanding the FTC's
02:42regulatory and enforcement powers. From being the only regulator to challenge a
02:46merger of two luxury fashion firms, Tapestry and Capri, to blocking aluminum's
02:51acquisition of cancer startup, Grail, it's clear, clear to us, that you continue to
02:56hold this view by blocking countless mergers. Are there any mergers that are
03:02good for the economy, in your view? So 98% of all mergers go through without even a
03:09second question being asked by the government. That's because you don't have
03:13enough staff to come after them, right? Is that the problem? Look, there are a whole
03:18bunch of mergers that pose legal issues, and we have an obligation to protect the
03:23American people from illegal consolidation. That's the job Congress
03:26has given us, and we do that job without fear or favor. One of the transactions
03:31you mentioned, the Illumina-Grail merger, that was unanimously voted out before I
03:35arrived. The Commission unanimously issued an opinion believing that deal
03:40was illegal, and we got a resounding win in the Fifth Circuit last year, saying
03:45that the FTC was right. This was an anti-competitive deal. So I think we're
03:49getting it right. Well, it's often been said that a broken clock is right twice
03:54a day, and and so I'm I'm not going to dispute the fact that there are things
03:58that the FTC is doing that that strike the right balance. I think the challenge
04:03for us is where where is there too much government? I mean, you talked about that
04:12you gave the example on cars, nitrogen-filled tires versus regular air
04:16tires. Do we need the government to tell us that? Is that what the purpose of
04:22government is? I struggle with with too much government. As a matter of fact,
04:28academia has reported that because of your background and that you've openly
04:33admitted, in someone's words, preferring to err on the side of overly aggressive
04:39enforcement rather than too passive enforcement. Do you do you admit to that?
04:46Well, Congressman, I do think that over the last 40 years we've seen huge
04:50amounts of consolidation that has resulted in a more centralized economy.
04:55Right? I mean, one of the contributors of America's economic success has been open
05:00competitive markets and free enterprise, and if we allow too much
05:04centralization, that's gonna set us back. And so I believe, and Congress has
05:09charged the FTC with vigorously enforcing the antitrust laws to ensure
05:14we have free enterprise and fair competition, and and that's what we do.
05:18Well, we'll we'll hold some of these questions for a little bit later, but
05:24suffice it to say the challenge for the members of this committee, given the
05:29pressure on the discretionary budget of the U.S. government, is to how much of
05:34this government can we actually afford, and where is there too much government?
05:41And that debate, I think, is still alive and well. I yield back.
05:49Thank you, Mr. Womack. We will now recognize Mr. Molnar.

Recommended